![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
Have not found it in English yet but pictures are worth a 1000 words.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SS_Bh0bbCo |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
still crying | ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
This video makes me cry.
I also cry when they have "turn in your gun days" in Hartford and they saw nice Colt percussion revolvers in half for $50.00 of debit cards. Couldn't they have used something else? [and I do love those Mythbuster guys] |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
They never check to see if the guns that are turned in are stolen. Come on down south...we respect the 2nd amendment!
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
Looked like a Federal 3-1/2" shell.... and a slug to boot! Gawd. What a shame!!
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
I guess they wanted a barrel that would have the greatest possibility for catistrofic failure so they used dam. barrels. Just why a Parker?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
but this test does shoy the great strenth these damascus barrels have...and i would not doubt that they had to ream the chambers to get the gun to close using that 3 1/2 inch shell..ive tryed just putting a 3 1/2 inch shell in some of these old guns and you could not breach it together... charlie
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|