Have these been honed?

[Bill Murphy]

Sorry, Chris, you're not correct with your math. The gun is just like most post 1895 Parkers, both in bore and choke.

[OH Osthaus]

Originally Posted by Bill Murphy

Sorry, Chris, you're not correct with your math. The gun is just like most post 1895 Parkers, both in bore and choke.

And wall thickness? Admittedly no Parker expert, but i would have expected more meat in damascus.

I measured a set of Parker tubes that I know for the fact were honed at least twice and that is almost exactly the wall measurements. I need to go back to the DGJ destructive tests and see where those Parkers fell.

Other damascus I have measured (light English guns) were thicker, and K Kearcher had lightly honed one of them for me.

Still learning here, a lot

Thanks

[Bill Murphy]

Could have been ground down on the outside. Or the measurements could be a little off.