![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Early Parker lifter | ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
More photos
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Alex Barret For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
What issue of Parker Pages has Ron Kirby's article on F.9.R.?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
What a nice gun to have. A graded lifter is a thing of beauty.
The gun would have been upgraded to the patent latch by the factory at a later point than originally made. It would have had the keyed forend originally. I would order a letter for the gun if there is information on it. There may be record of the return for the work as well. I have seen examples of this before. It looks like your stock head has some issues and the lock plates are working their way back which has caused the issues with the wood. If the barrels are sound and shootable, it still should not be shot much in order to preserve the stock head.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
Brian’s right. The 4-pin lock plates indicate it is very likely to be a predecessor to the Grade-3 or later, the D grade.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
![]() |
First year production | ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
So, you know you have a first year of production Parker. The Parker Gun Identification & Serialization book lists it on page 66 as a 0 (Zero) grade gun, but obviously with the engraving it has it is a higher grade, as was suggested earlier. The information for this gun does say it was made with 32" barrels and that it is a 12 gauge. If you want some of the issues fixed with this gun, the most obvious choice is the person that chimed in talking about its beauty, Brian Dudley. There are very few people in the US that can do it justice. I would NOT trust others with its care. Good luck and keep us posted; seriously.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Larry Stauch For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Larry, thank you for the information and kind words.
Brian Dudley, thank you. Yes the association listed there was info on the gun and I am following that up. The shotgun appears operable but I would not shoot it now because of the stock. As I said earlier the gun reportedly fell from a wall display. The stock is cracked pretty bad. You can see some of the cracks in the photographs. Any other info you gentlemen have is greatly appreciated. Thanks again. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Alex Barret For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|