Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Forcing Cones Question
Unread 03-03-2020, 07:30 AM   #1
Member
Live A Life Of Purpose
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 22
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts

Default Forcing Cones Question

I have a 12-gauge DHE that I’m looking at extending the forcing cones to achieve 2 3/4” is there any recommendations on minimum breach to barrel thickness that is recommended to make sure you are not ruining the gun? I was trying to find some information on this before I have this work done to the gun.

Thanks Eddy
EddyDehmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2020, 07:40 AM   #2
Member
Milton C Starr
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,509
Thanks: 476
Thanked 1,009 Times in 466 Posts

Default

Not sure how helpful this is but ive seen other forum members say Kirk Merrington can evaluate your barrels and tell you what is or is not possible .
Milton C Starr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2020, 07:47 AM   #3
Member
Grouse28
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 83
Thanks: 46
Thanked 65 Times in 31 Posts

Default

Don’t do it, why take a nice DHE and violate it. Shoot proper shells in it. Yea may be more expensive, but really how many shots do you shoot through it, not withstanding SC.
If you want to shot big shells get a proper gun. Just my feelings, but at this time you are the caretaker of the gun.
David Gehman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to David Gehman For Your Post:
Unread 03-03-2020, 08:18 AM   #4
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,932
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 8,544 Times in 3,345 Posts

Default

I agree, you don’t need to do it

But Just a small terminology point

You would need to lengthen the chambers to accept 2 3/4, it’s not just the forcing cone
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post:
Unread 03-03-2020, 08:38 AM   #5
Member
Woodcock survey
PGCA Member
 
Daniel Carter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,064
Thanks: 1,596
Thanked 1,604 Times in 668 Posts

Default

What does the chamber measure now?
Daniel Carter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2020, 08:42 AM   #6
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,263
Thanks: 368
Thanked 4,250 Times in 1,379 Posts

Default

1. There is no justification for lengthening 2 5/8" chambers to 2 3/4"
2. There might be some advantage in lengthening vintage 1/2" - 5/8" forcing cones...BY AN EXPERT. Done wrong = ruined barrel



Scroll down about 1/3 here for a summary of Sherman Bell's study which suggested than pressure might be decreased somewhat with a longer cone.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...vwLYc-kGA/edit
Because the angle of the cone is greater than the external taper of the barrels, in thick walled U.S. maker's 12g (but possibly not light British 12g game guns or small bores) there is usually greater wall thickness in the cone than at the end of the chamber (breech to right)



I still wouldn't do it

Last edited by Drew Hause; 03-03-2020 at 04:27 PM..
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 03-03-2020, 09:30 AM   #7
Member
Garth Gustafson
PGCA Member
 
Garth Gustafson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 663
Thanks: 1,841
Thanked 1,607 Times in 424 Posts

Default

Have your barrels inspected by a knowledgeable double gunsmith for safe wall thickness and be sure to shoot loads the gun was designed for. No need to lengthen chambers. This load data sheet has been posted here before.
Attached Images
File Type: png 8E4229C8-5A7A-4D0F-B88D-367D41D45FA7.png (397.3 KB, 187 views)
Garth Gustafson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Garth Gustafson For Your Post:
Unread 03-03-2020, 11:15 AM   #8
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,932
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 8,544 Times in 3,345 Posts

Default

I am always surprised to read that there was not much difference between paper and plastic 2 3/4 hulls when used in 2 5/8 chambers- to my non expert mind - I tend to think the thinner plastic hull would result in less pressure all else being equal
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
Photo Question
Unread 03-03-2020, 07:19 PM   #9
Member
Live A Life Of Purpose
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 22
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts

Default Photo Question

Currently the barrels are at 2 9/16" when I measured them. Originally when the gun was purchased it was stated to be a 2 3/4" shotgun. Remington era after they took it over from Parker. However the barrels were not what was quoted. So I did get a very sizeable refund and the from the all the specs everything lined up in the books on the serial numbers across the board on the entire gun. I was looking for a newer Parker so I can reload 2 3/4" as I do a fair amount of waterfowl and pheasants that needs steel so obviously I buy RST shells in Bismuth. I have another DHE that is an older gun around the 1908 timeframe that is 2 9/16" that I love to shoot and the barrels all tested exact per purchasing. My question would be where do you send barrels to get looked at. I do have a barrel thickness gauge and I do measure the barrels, breach, etc. But where do you send barrels off to get inspected for cracks etc. I want to keep the integrity of the original state, but you have to go through a lot of guns to find guns that have not been tampered with. I appreciate all of your ideas and thoughts.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew Hause View Post
1. There is no justification for lengthening 2 5/8" chambers to 2 3/4"
2. There might be some advantage in lengthening vintage 1/2" - 5/8" forcing cones...BY AN EXPERT. Done wrong = ruined barrel



Scroll down about 1/3 here for a summary of Sherman Bell's study which suggested than pressure might be decreased somewhat with a longer cone.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...vwLYc-kGA/edit
Because the angle of the cone is greater than the external taper of the barrels, in thick walled U.S. maker's 12g (but possibly not light British 12g game guns or small bores) there is usually greater wall thickness in the cone than at the end of the chamber (breech to right)



I still wouldn't do it
EddyDehmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-04-2020, 06:53 AM   #10
Member
Garth Gustafson
PGCA Member
 
Garth Gustafson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 663
Thanks: 1,841
Thanked 1,607 Times in 424 Posts

Default

Pat Laib in Spicer, MN works on Parkers and he can inspect and measure your barrels. Kirk Merrington is in Tx and he comes highly recommended. For a complete list of member recommendations see the FAQ section on the PGCA home page.
Garth Gustafson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Garth Gustafson For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.