Forcing Cones Question
 

I have a 12-gauge DHE that I’m looking at extending the forcing cones to achieve 2 3/4” is there any recommendations on minimum breach to barrel thickness that is recommended to make sure you are not ruining the gun? I was trying to find some information on this before I have this work done to the gun.

Thanks Eddy

Not sure how helpful this is but ive seen other forum members say Kirk Merrington can evaluate your barrels and tell you what is or is not possible .

Don’t do it, why take a nice DHE and violate it. Shoot proper shells in it. Yea may be more expensive, but really how many shots do you shoot through it, not withstanding SC.
If you want to shot big shells get a proper gun. Just my feelings, but at this time you are the caretaker of the gun.

I agree, you don’t need to do it

But Just a small terminology point

You would need to lengthen the chambers to accept 2 3/4, it’s not just the forcing cone

What does the chamber measure now?

1. There is no justification for lengthening 2 5/8" chambers to 2 3/4"
2. There might be some advantage in lengthening vintage 1/2" - 5/8" forcing cones...BY AN EXPERT. Done wrong = ruined barrel

http://pic20.picturetrail.com:80/VOL.../408857932.jpg

Scroll down about 1/3 here for a summary of Sherman Bell's study which suggested than pressure might be decreased somewhat with a longer cone.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...vwLYc-kGA/edit
Because the angle of the cone is greater than the external taper of the barrels, in thick walled U.S. maker's 12g (but possibly not light British 12g game guns or small bores) there is usually greater wall thickness in the cone than at the end of the chamber (breech to right)

http://pic20.picturetrail.com:80/VOL.../414172908.jpg

I still wouldn't do it ;)

Have your barrels inspected by a knowledgeable double gunsmith for safe wall thickness and be sure to shoot loads the gun was designed for. No need to lengthen chambers. This load data sheet has been posted here before.

I am always surprised to read that there was not much difference between paper and plastic 2 3/4 hulls when used in 2 5/8 chambers- to my non expert mind - I tend to think the thinner plastic hull would result in less pressure all else being equal

Photo Question
 

Currently the barrels are at 2 9/16" when I measured them. Originally when the gun was purchased it was stated to be a 2 3/4" shotgun. Remington era after they took it over from Parker. However the barrels were not what was quoted. So I did get a very sizeable refund and the from the all the specs everything lined up in the books on the serial numbers across the board on the entire gun. I was looking for a newer Parker so I can reload 2 3/4" as I do a fair amount of waterfowl and pheasants that needs steel so obviously I buy RST shells in Bismuth. I have another DHE that is an older gun around the 1908 timeframe that is 2 9/16" that I love to shoot and the barrels all tested exact per purchasing. My question would be where do you send barrels to get looked at. I do have a barrel thickness gauge and I do measure the barrels, breach, etc. But where do you send barrels off to get inspected for cracks etc. I want to keep the integrity of the original state, but you have to go through a lot of guns to find guns that have not been tampered with. I appreciate all of your ideas and thoughts.

Pat Laib in Spicer, MN works on Parkers and he can inspect and measure your barrels. Kirk Merrington is in Tx and he comes highly recommended. For a complete list of member recommendations see the FAQ section on the PGCA home page.