View Single Post
Unread 10-04-2019, 10:21 AM   #33
Member
JLoew
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,524
Thanks: 6,487
Thanked 6,693 Times in 888 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy View Post
Getting back to Craig's original post, I am of the opinion that ATF does not want "non guns", in other words, pre 1898, in a licensee's bound book. Their reasoning is that a non gun is none of their business.
My understanding is that this has nothing to do with ATF and everything to do with New York’s safe act.
Josh Loewensteiner is offline   Reply With Quote