View Single Post
Unread 01-30-2018, 04:04 PM   #14
Member
MD*GSP
PGCA Member
 
Scot Cardillo's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 638
Thanks: 1,113
Thanked 684 Times in 247 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Budgeon View Post
Richard, the intent of a lighter rear trigger pull is not to make it lighter, the intent is to make the sear engagement identical to the front trigger. When equal engagement is achieved the rear trigger pulls up to a half pound less because of the increased distance from the axis to the finger pull. In addition to your theory of reasons to increase rear trigger pull, Dan @ MST shared a popular theory there, that since rear triggers have more leverage, pull weight is increased so that it feels like the front trigger. To me this theory is BS and furthermore increasing trigger pulls also increases sear wear.
Craig, thank you for the mechanical explanation regarding front & rear trigger pulls.

Your statement however, is contradictory. On one hand you provide the mechanical explanation for a higher rear trigger pull (leverage) but then, call BS on the very same principal cited by another, that, supports your explanation

Maybe you're simply saying an increased pull on the rear trigger is unnecessary? Can you elaborate??
Scot Cardillo is offline   Reply With Quote