![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
That particular gun has very thin barrels back by the chambers. Would advise caution.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Aaron Beck For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Thank you Chris and Aaron for your replies!
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
As chris stated, the stock is not original and is pretty poorly shaped. Based on the wood alone on that gun, I would not get into it.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
An easy check is to look for the stock serial number under the trigger guard tang.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
I will say it again, that is not the be-all-end-all way to tell anything. Just because a stock has numbers under the guard, does NOT make it original.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
Ok I didn’t say that it was the “be all end all”did I ? Without the serial number , non originality is clear. With the serial number , originality is generally certain. Some good stock makers have been known to stamp the serial number as was done on original guns. If the stock was poorly done , then the serial number presence would not help towards originality.
So I disagree that the stock serial number fails to tell anything. But then I am not an expert on Parkers or any other gun. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Looks like someone also cut about 2" off the forend?
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|