![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Shot size varied significantly by the turn-of-the-century maker. Most U.S. doubles were patterned with Tatham's
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Thank you all for your info. I was hoping for a universal standard used. Guess not.
Bob Jurewicz |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Once the stock books we just acquired are photographed, the information on shells used to pattern Parker guns will be included in research letters. I will pick up the stock books at the Southern and it should take about 2 months to photograph them. Once that's done, the info will be in all new letters.
More information will be forth coming on any additional cost to add that new info to your letter/letters that were done in the past. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
The ammo we are shooting out of these vintage guns is in a different league than what guns of that era were patterned with. It's still fun to see those numbers though.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post: |
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
And in most cases, quite a bit tighter. (and better)
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to J. Scott Hanes For Your Post: |
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Sure. Harder shot, plastic shotcups protecting that shot and progressive burning powders.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|