Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Reproductions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-18-2025, 11:01 AM   #1
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,397
Thanks: 1,299
Thanked 3,943 Times in 1,072 Posts

Default

Paul, I agree with almost everything you wrote in the above post. It is true that all Repros have chrome-lined barrels. However, and what has been reported here in this sub-forum by an authoritative source, using empirical data, is that the SSSs have chrome-lining through the choke area, whereas the regular run of Repros do not.

I am open to correction, please correct me if I'm wrong.
__________________
Wild Skies
Since 1951
Greg Baehman is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-20-2025, 11:02 AM   #2
Member
GH-16
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,081
Thanks: 5,966
Thanked 1,479 Times in 507 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Baehman View Post
Paul, I agree with almost everything you wrote in the above post. It is true that all Repros have chrome-lined barrels. However, and what has been reported here in this sub-forum by an authoritative source, using empirical data, is that the SSSs have chrome-lining through the choke area, whereas the regular run of Repros do not.

I am open to correction, please correct me if I'm wrong.
I've been around the industrial chroming game some with cylinder lining in diesel engines, my mechanical instincts tell me that it doesn't make sense that you can exclude the choke area while chroming the other 90% of the bore. The only way I see this possible is for the chokes to be cut after the chroming process was done. Why would they cut the chokes before the chroming process on the SSS and not on the rest of the Repro barrels as they went down the production line? Just my curious mind telling me something isn't passing the sniff test here.

I'm still of the thought that all Parker repro's were ran through the same production processes at the factory and the SSS were for the most part just a marketing tool for the dealer that special ordered them for their shop.

An item I try to keep in mind is that when the SSS were made steel shot was just immerging on the scene for waterfowl hunting and there was very little knowledge about it at the time and a dealer having a special run of guns made & marketed as steel shot specials was a great sales hook. This worked so well that we still revere them to this day. Now, here we are having a discussion about a new non-tox shot hitting the market and the circle starts again--Is it safe to shoot it in my gun.

If repro's were still in production, we could have a special run of TSS specials made. Ten bucks says a bunch of them would be sold
Paul Ehlers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paul Ehlers For Your Post:
Unread 04-20-2025, 11:54 AM   #3
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,397
Thanks: 1,299
Thanked 3,943 Times in 1,072 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Ehlers View Post
I've been around the industrial chroming game some with cylinder lining in diesel engines, my mechanical instincts tell me that it doesn't make sense that you can exclude the choke area while chroming the other 90% of the bore. The only way I see this possible is for the chokes to be cut after the chroming process was done. Why would they cut the chokes before the chroming process on the SSS and not on the rest of the Repro barrels as they went down the production line? Just my curious mind telling me something isn't passing the sniff test here.

I'm still of the thought that all Parker repro's were ran through the same production processes at the factory and the SSS were for the most part just a marketing tool for the dealer that special ordered them for their shop.

An item I try to keep in mind is that when the SSS were made steel shot was just immerging on the scene for waterfowl hunting and there was very little knowledge about it at the time and a dealer having a special run of guns made & marketed as steel shot specials was a great sales hook. This worked so well that we still revere them to this day. Now, here we are having a discussion about a new non-tox shot hitting the market and the circle starts again--Is it safe to shoot it in my gun.

If repro's were still in production, we could have a special run of TSS specials made. Ten bucks says a bunch of them would be sold
Page 4 of the below linked thread brought forth information by a couple of individuals more knowledgable regarding industrial chrome lining and more intimately involved with the development of the SSS than myself.
https://parkerguns.org/forums/showth...ghlight=chrome
__________________
Wild Skies
Since 1951
Greg Baehman is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Greg Baehman For Your Post:
Unread 04-21-2025, 10:20 AM   #4
Member
GH-16
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,081
Thanks: 5,966
Thanked 1,479 Times in 507 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Baehman View Post
Page 4 of the below linked thread brought forth information by a couple of individuals more knowledgable regarding industrial chrome lining and more intimately involved with the development of the SSS than myself.
https://parkerguns.org/forums/showth...ghlight=chrome
I fully respect what our fellow member Mr. Allen has to say about the production of the SSS. I just wish we had some actual technical production data to give some definitive proof of differences between standard repro's and the SSS's.

My problem is I have a skeptical mind and am constantly questioning many of the things we see on the internet & elsewhere anymore. My phrase for this is it's the internet form of urban Myth & Ledgen. There's a ton of it on all the gun forms on a wide range of subjects & some of the information on the Parker Repro's falls into this bucket.

In the big picture of things, it's great that we have the special run of Steel Shot Specials and I'm really glad we have them.
Paul Ehlers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-21-2025, 10:53 AM   #5
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,397
Thanks: 1,299
Thanked 3,943 Times in 1,072 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Ehlers View Post
I fully respect what our fellow member Mr. Allen has to say about the production of the SSS. I just wish we had some actual technical production data to give some definitive proof of differences between standard repro's and the SSS's.

My problem is I have a skeptical mind and am constantly questioning many of the things we see on the internet & elsewhere anymore. My phrase for this is it's the internet form of urban Myth & Ledgen. There's a ton of it on all the gun forms on a wide range of subjects & some of the information on the Parker Repro's falls into this bucket.

In the big picture of things, it's great that we have the special run of Steel Shot Specials and I'm really glad we have them.
Well, how about bringing some of that Parker Repro Urban Myth & Legend information you talk about to the Parker Reproduction "Production Chart" thread? We all might further our knowledge . . .
__________________
Wild Skies
Since 1951
Greg Baehman is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.