![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Mills it's not that I don't like the PGCA because I do. I just think that long term annual members should have the ability to vote and possibly run for board positions. In 12+ years of membership I have contributed more financially than the life member who made a one time payment of $300.
How many of the life members do you actually know? Why can they make better decisions than an annual member who has been around a long time? I have been a member much longer than you have but because your a life member you can make better decisions than I can? In the long run this line of thinking will result in failure. Every organization needs new blood.
__________________
There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter...Earnest Hemingway |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
I am going to hop into this once, and that's it...I have brought these same points up to members of the board and they have been dismissed. Ok so be it, most clubs allow annual members to vote, as Rich says, maybe after ten years who knows but we do need new blood from the annual members, or is this what I said fifteen years ago, are we aspiring to become an "elitist" club.
Ok know I am out of here, said my peace. Eric
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Eric Eis For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|