![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Another try of the ad scan |
|
|
#13 | ||||||
|
Kiffe ad.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#14 | ||||||
|
Thanks Gary, If you read that carefully, there is no confusion. It is what it is. And I am not surprised at that proof testing.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#15 | |||||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
#16 | ||||||
|
Most likely an advertisement ploy. Not unusual back then. Most companys were interested in selling their product and they didn't care how they did it.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#17 | ||||||
|
I proof tested a Winchester Model 1901 ten gauge cannon with as much powder as the shell would hold (eight drams of black) and more powder up the barrel with a wad in front. I made the mistake of firing it while the cannon was on top of a wood pile instead of on the ground. The cannon did a back flip and landed on the asphalt of my driveway. I guess it was a soft surface, because the cast iron carriage of the cannon was not damaged. This is probably how Winchester did the 9 dram test. Of course, there was no shot in front of my cannon load.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#18 | ||||||
|
woulda loved to seen that bill...charlie
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#19 | ||||||
|
Bruce, do you know how many 97's were made with damascus?
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#20 | ||||||
|
I don't know.
But here is the one pound test. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|