Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-25-2012, 03:56 PM   #21
Member
Mark Brady
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

Default

I agree about the Remington doubles being under rated. I own two 1900's one is a trap gun (ejectors and no safety), an 1882, and I just picked up an 1889 that looks like it just came out of the factory and is not restored. I bought the 1889 for $450.00 proving you can still get a deal on a good side by side.
Mark Brady is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Brady For Your Post:
Unread 11-25-2012, 04:05 PM   #22
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,865
Thanks: 1,645
Thanked 4,803 Times in 1,369 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Brady View Post
I agree about the Remington doubles being under rated. I own two 1900's one is a trap gun (ejectors and no safety), an 1882, and I just picked up an 1889 that looks like it just came out of the factory and is not restored. I bought the 1889 for $450.00 proving you can still get a deal on a good side by side.
I was aware that Remington made a model 1894 straight grip trap gun (F grade) but I was not aware of the Model 1900 version. If you could post some pictures I would love to see it.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-29-2012, 10:12 AM   #23
Member
Rodney Short
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 31
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Default

i have 2 rem 94's both grade A damascus, one ejector one extractor, both are excellent field guns, one i have is first yr production, the other is 1901 vintage according to charles semners book, they are very under rated guns, i hunt with english and american made guns, i consider the remingtons equals to the english guns,
Rodney Short is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-29-2012, 03:52 PM   #24
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,794 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

i too have a remington 1894 its a b grade with factory ordance steel barrels that are 26 inch factory length with ejectors..its just a good shooter but i too would put a remington 94 with the best of shotguns.... charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-29-2012, 06:17 PM   #25
Member
Double Lab
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Daryl Corona's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,318
Thanks: 15,391
Thanked 6,268 Times in 2,424 Posts

Default

It's not a crow killer but it's a nice M1900 16ga. w/ejectors, 28" nice original finish. She's choked M/F so I don't know what she can kill but it will be fun trying. Really nice quality for a modest price.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg PA270057.jpg (453.9 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg PA270058.jpg (507.8 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg PA270059.jpg (491.2 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg PA270060.jpg (532.6 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg PA270055.jpg (523.6 KB, 0 views)
Daryl Corona is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post:
Unread 11-29-2012, 07:45 PM   #26
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,865
Thanks: 1,645
Thanked 4,803 Times in 1,369 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daryl Corona View Post
It's not a crow killer but it's a nice M1900 16ga. w/ejectors, 28" nice original finish. She's choked M/F so I don't know what she can kill but it will be fun trying. Really nice quality for a modest price.
I am sure you will enjoy it Daryl, have fun.

Here is an interesting article on the Remington Doubles.

http://www.bigfivehq.com/wolves3.htm
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Unread 11-30-2012, 08:51 AM   #27
Member
Richard Flanders
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Richard Flanders's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 8,480
Thanked 5,538 Times in 1,717 Posts

Default

I have an 1889 Rem damascus hammer gun with tight chokes that is great long range killer. Very nicely made also. I like it a lot. It was quite the cleanup job when I got it. There's a series of pics in an old post of mine. I've had no mechanical issues with it at all except that one hammer screw keeps backing out. I have to make a custom punch that will allow me to peen the square shaft back out to get the hammer to fit tighter to remedy that.
Richard Flanders is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-30-2012, 12:00 PM   #28
Member
Steve McCarty
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 306 Times in 211 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Flanders View Post
I have an 1889 Rem damascus hammer gun with tight chokes that is great long range killer. Very nicely made also. I like it a lot. It was quite the cleanup job when I got it. There's a series of pics in an old post of mine. I've had no mechanical issues with it at all except that one hammer screw keeps backing out. I have to make a custom punch that will allow me to peen the square shaft back out to get the hammer to fit tighter to remedy that.
How about you wrap the screw with a little plumber's tape? Might work. I have shimmed loose hammers to tighten them up. Works okay.
Steve McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-30-2012, 03:46 PM   #29
Member
Mark Brady
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

Default

Mr. Books

My Remington trap gun may be a 1894, I've always had a hard time telling the difference between them. My camera is down right now, but I'll list the info on the water table and barrels, maybe you or someone could help me figure this out.Serial #331632 on all parts, Water table is also marked 177, 8, a double stamped patent date of Oct 30 1894. The lug is stamped at the front with 10 over 83 over P7. The rear of the lug is stamped with a 7 and 323, 321 which I assume is shot size and pellet count. Each barrel is marked with three diagonal lines over K, over A. Any help with this would be appreciated, thanks in advance.
Mark Brady is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Brady For Your Post:
Unread 11-30-2012, 06:26 PM   #30
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,865
Thanks: 1,645
Thanked 4,803 Times in 1,369 Posts

Default

A serial number in the 300,000 range would make it a model 1900, model 1894's had serial numbers in the 100,000 range. The biggest difference between the two models is the '94 has a Purdey style forend latch and the 1900 uses a Baker style snap on latch similiar to the Trojan. Dave Noreen knows quite a bit about Remington doubles hopefully he will come along soon and give some more insight.

Some information Dave posted awhile ago on the Remington forums:

http://www.remingtonsociety.com/foru...php?f=7&t=2491
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.