Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Winchester 21
Unread 03-10-2011, 01:05 AM   #1
Member
David
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 109
Thanks: 237
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts

Default Winchester 21

Winchester 21 or Parker ?
David Long is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-10-2011, 05:46 AM   #2
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,666
Thanks: 35,720
Thanked 33,302 Times in 12,393 Posts

Default

Parker, no question.
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 03-10-2011, 06:55 AM   #3
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,888
Thanks: 4,375
Thanked 4,048 Times in 1,727 Posts

Default

There is no question that a Model 21 is a well built gun and are rugged as all get out but I have found them to be clubby feeling.At least the ones that I have shot. I am sure there are some well balanced 21's out there but I haven't found one. As far as style I like the early guns with the sculpted frame better than the flat sided guns. Gun for gun The Parker Gun just seems to be more dynamic as well built and much more ascetically pleasing than the 21.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Dave Suponski For Your Post:
Unread 03-10-2011, 07:03 AM   #4
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,666
Thanks: 35,720
Thanked 33,302 Times in 12,393 Posts

Default

I want what Dave had for breakfast.

Yeah, what Dave said.
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 03-10-2011, 07:06 AM   #5
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

David,

What did you expect asking M21 or Parker on the Parker forum?

What is you intention? Is is as a shooter, collecting, appreciation, upland hunting, waterfowling, clays gun or?

If you want the strongest action then between Parker and M21 it is the M21. But if you what to shoot super hot loads buy one good autoloader. The recoil will be far less.

I owned a M21 Duck which was a fine gun. I let it go and put the received funds in another Parker. With far too many long barreled 12 and 10 gauge guns my favorite fowling piece is a Parker EH 10 Gauge in which I shot 2 7/8" low pressure loads. I have had performance with 1 & 3/8 oz Nice Shot that far exceeds my shooting ability.

So, M21 or Parker? There are some great buys on Parkers in this repressed market. One might even find a M21 at a good price.

You might however ask the same question on the M21 forum. I think Dick who runs that forum also owns Parkers.

PS: While I sold my M21 Duck I still own a M23 Heavy Duck. The M23 is a Japenese made gun but it fits me perfectly. Plus, with it I can shoot any steel shot high pressure loads without worry. That stated, I haven't shot the M23 in a couple years. I shoot and hunt with classic American SxS's.

I hope this babbling helps,
Mark
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post:
Unread 03-10-2011, 07:09 AM   #6
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

More Coffee Dean!!! That's what Dave had...
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-10-2011, 08:27 AM   #7
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,611
Thanks: 6,188
Thanked 8,889 Times in 4,765 Posts

Default

It was a confusing question that morphed into a discussion of waterfowl guns. That's OK with me. Anyone who doesn't own a #2 or #3 frame Parker, a Model 21 Duck, and a Super Fox, should go shopping.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Or maybe a 12 gauge LC Smith Longrange?
Unread 03-19-2011, 09:57 AM   #8
Member
Old and Reliable
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 1,674
Thanked 363 Times in 239 Posts

Default Or maybe a 12 gauge LC Smith Longrange?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy View Post
It was a confusing question that morphed into a discussion of waterfowl guns. That's OK with me. Anyone who doesn't own a #2 or #3 frame Parker, a Model 21 Duck, and a Super Fox, should go shopping.
-- IMO- the M21 is like a Stevens 311 with ejectors and a very good single trigger- all way heavy for their gauge. Best scaled smaller gauged doubles to frame and balance- imo again- the Phila AH Fox series.

A former grouse hunting pal has a M21 20 made in 1939 26" WS-1 and WS-2, ejectors, double triggers (yea!!) straight grip, small beavertail, but it weighs a even 15 ounces more than my 1936 Savage Utica 20 bore Sterly with 28" barrels, DT and ejectors. As legs kill grouse, after a full day's trek in the coverts, a difference of about one lb. adds up, especially as we age.

I once owned a 12 HE 32" Full and Extremely Full-but at the same aprox weight as a M-1 Garand, learned to love my 8 lb. Smith with 32" VR barrels even more. In a duck/goose gun, where you are not walking afield all day, the extra weight, providing the balance and proper gun fit is extant, no big deal- M21's are "Hell for Stout", but I prefer Parkers and Smiths- and the laws of supply/demand re: pricing- fewer M21's even made than Parker, Smith and Ithacas-
Francis Morin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-19-2011, 08:05 PM   #9
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,611
Thanks: 6,188
Thanked 8,889 Times in 4,765 Posts

Default

In answer to the original poster, we should own and enjoy both Parkers and Model 21s. They are wonderful guns for birds and waterfowl. I have had Model 21 20 gauges that weighed the same, to the ounce, as 20 and 16 gauge 0 frame Parkers. We have to look at the individual gun to evaluate it's suitability for certain uses.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 03-10-2011, 08:46 AM   #10
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,616 Times in 2,667 Posts

Default

Of the 21's I think the best are the 16ga's. They are built on the small frame, the same one used for 16's and 20's, and are better handling than the 12's. The trouble is that they will weigh about 7lbs and you can get the same ga, same barrel length in a 1 frame Parker and it will weight 4-8oz less and be faster handling. But I really like the 16ga 21's, they are great feeling guns.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.