Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Questions about an 1894 Parker Brothers with Damascus steel
Unread 11-01-2023, 11:37 PM   #1
Member
Alan Searcy
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 3
Thanks: 1
Thanked 12 Times in 3 Posts

Default Questions about an 1894 Parker Brothers with Damascus steel

Greetings!

I believe I have an 1894 hammerless 12 gauge Parker side by side with Damascus barrels. Serial number 80636. The barrels are like mirrors, they look like brand new. No pitting whatsoever. I have the original tag from the shop when it was bought and it says it can fire bulk smokeless powder. In faint red diagonal lettering it also says that it was fired with Nitro powder. Does this mean I can shoot modern low brass field loads for birds? I'm leery because it has the Damascus steel. Shoots two and three quarter black powder shells just fine!. Any thoughts from you wise individuals would be welcome! Thanks!
Alan
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20230402_185924.jpg (529.4 KB, 27 views)
File Type: jpg 20231029_191217.jpg (529.7 KB, 17 views)

Last edited by Alan Searcy; 11-02-2023 at 12:25 AM..
Alan Searcy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Alan Searcy For Your Post:
Unread 11-02-2023, 08:19 AM   #2
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,344
Thanks: 3,164
Thanked 12,295 Times in 3,284 Posts

Default

I can't even imagine owning such a gun and not shooting mild, low pressure ammo. There are countless recipes for the hand-loader, and commercial ammo from people like RST.
A good educational read is Sherman Bell's tests on Damascus steel barrels. One of the greatest hoodwinks ever perpetrated on the shooting sportsman. Some say it was the gun manufacturer's idea to get every 'dangerous damascus gun' relegated to the closet and sell the new, steel barreled guns.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Unread 11-02-2023, 04:53 PM   #3
Member
Alan Searcy
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 3
Thanks: 1
Thanked 12 Times in 3 Posts

Default

Thank you Edgar! I really love this shotgun! Never had anything quite so fancy and quite so deadly. Black powder is kind of a pain to acquire and to clean up after. I'd like to shoot some low brass three dram modern smokeless ammo through it with seven and a half lead shot. Sounds like I'll probably be okay?
Alan Searcy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Alan Searcy For Your Post:
Unread 11-02-2023, 06:37 PM   #4
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,175
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,997 Times in 1,308 Posts

Default

Very nice Alan
It would be worth looking at this resource, with links to more
https://www.shotgunworld.com/threads...-shoot.366087/

c. 1894 1 1/8 oz. 3 Drams BULK Smokeless pressures were 6000 - 8000 psi; Dense Smokeless very similar to today's loads.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...aAfUOZEFU/edit
It would be reasonable to restrict your shells to 1 oz. at 1200 fps target loads.
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 11-06-2023, 02:00 PM   #5
Member
Alan Searcy
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 3
Thanks: 1
Thanked 12 Times in 3 Posts

Default

Thanks Drew!

The chamber pressure of the modern ammo is likely my biggest concern moving forward. I plan on making this new (to me) SxS my go to field gun. It hunts like a dream!

Alan
Alan Searcy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Alan Searcy For Your Post:
Unread 11-06-2023, 08:39 PM   #6
Member
John Davis
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
John Davis's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,956
Thanks: 4,020
Thanked 6,984 Times in 1,328 Posts

Default

Great gun. You should also consider joining the PGCA. Best $40.00 you’ll spend this year.
__________________
"Life is short and you're dead an awful long time." Destry L. Hoffard

"Oh Christ, just shoot the damn thing."
Destry L. Hoffard
John Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to John Davis For Your Post:
Unread 11-07-2023, 11:17 PM   #7
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,710
Thanks: 1,741
Thanked 8,159 Times in 2,448 Posts

Default

Wood smokeless powder was invented in 1876. For years our ammunition companies offered all brass and paper NPEs and shooters loaded their own shotgun shells or small local firms, sporting goods and hardware stores, hand loaded shells for them. Chamberlin Cartridge Co. was one of the first offering machine loaded shells in the mid-1880s. In their 1886-7 catalog they offered smokeless powder loads, highlighted in red --

1886-7 page 7 Wood Smokeless Powder loads highlighted in red.jpg

In 1890, Capt. A.W. Money and his family moved to the U.S. from England and opened the American E.C. & Schultze Powder Company in Oakland Park, Bergen County, New Jersey with offices in NYC, making smokeless powders.

E.C. Powder can.jpg

The big companies began offering factory loaded shells by the early 1890s. Union Metallic Cartridge Co. was offering smokeless powder shells in 1891. Winchester offered smokeless powder shotgun shells to selected shooters in 1893 and to the general public in 1894. When Remington Arms Co. introduced their Remington Hammerless Double in 1894, their catalogs state their shotguns were adapted to all nitro powders.

1894 Catalog intro page.jpg
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 11-08-2023, 07:25 AM   #8
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,175
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,997 Times in 1,308 Posts

Default

As did Parker. 1902 Sears catalog listing
"ALL ARE BORED FOR NITRO OR BLACK POWDER"

Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 11-08-2023, 12:13 PM   #9
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,710
Thanks: 1,741
Thanked 8,159 Times in 2,448 Posts

Default

Drew, do you have info on what shells the shooters were using at the early GAHs in 1893 & 1894? Smokeless? Black? A mix?
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-08-2023, 01:30 PM   #10
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,175
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,997 Times in 1,308 Posts

Default

Sporting Life did not document the guns, powder and shells for the GAH until 1896
https://digital.la84.org/digital/col...oll17/id/47169

March 2, 1894 Riverton vs. Carteret
Fred Hoey - Purdey, 7# 8 oz., 48 gr. “Schultz”
Charles Macalester - Purdey, 7# 5 oz., 50 gr. “Schultz”
Capt. A.W. Money - Greener, 7# 8 oz., 45 gr. “E.C.”
George Work - Purdey, 7# 8 oz., 48 gr.
Edgar Murphy - Parker, 7# 6 oz., 42 gr.
T.S. Dando - Parker, 7# 6 oz., 3 1/2 Drams
H.Y. Dolan - Scott, 7# 8 oz., 48 gr.
R.A. Welsh - Churchill, 7# 9 oz., 49 gr.

February 23, 1895 Sporting Life Keystone Crow Shoot
https://digital.la84.org/digital/col...id/55021/rec/8
1 1/4 oz. loads and no black powder
Mott shot a Greener gun with 48 grs. E.C. powder.
Bergner shot a LeFever gun with 48 grs. E.C. powder.
Jones used a Clabrough gun with 48 grs. E.C. powder.
Leonard shot a Wesley Richards gun with 45 grs. E.C. powder.
W. H. Wolstencroft shot a Francotte gun and 48 grs. American Wood Powder.
Budd used a Parker gun and 52 grs. E.C. powder.
Landis shot an L.C. Smith gun with 48 grs. E.C. powder.
Thurman used an L.C. Smith gun with 50 grs. American Wood Powder.
Leaming shot an L.C. Smith gun with 48 grs. E.C. powder.
Isaac Wolstencroft shot a Greener gun with 52 grs. Schultz powder.
Davids used an L.C. Smith gun and 47 grs. E.C. powder.
Edwards shot a Cla*brough gun and 48 grs. E.C. powder.
James Wolstencroft shot a Greener gun and 50 grs. E.C. powder.
Ed Hill used an L.C. Smith gun, 10 bore, and 52 grs. E.C. powder.
Zweilin used an L.C. Smith gun and 48 grs. E.C. powder.
Morfey shot a Greener gun with 49 grs. E.C. powder.
Rothacker used a Colt's gun with 56 grs. (4 Dr. Eq.) Schultz powder.
Hothersoll shot an L.C. Smith gun with 50 grs. American Wood Powder.
W. M. Pack shot a Greener gun with 52 grs. Schultz powder.
(Capt. A.W.) Money shot a Greener gun with 49 grs. E.C. powder.
W. H. Pack shot a Francotte gun with 50 grs. Schultz.
Treadway used a Greener gun with 48 grs. E.C. powder.

NOT light loads

Grains = Dram Equivalence c. 1895
(by 1900 “E.C.” and “Schultze” were equivalent at 14 grains/dram)

…………..“E.C.”…..”Schultze”
3 Dr. Eq……44………..42
3 1/4……….45.5………45
3 1/2……….49…….…..48
3 3/4……….53…….…..51

First Grand Smokeless Championship Handicap Live-bird Tournament given by the E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. Oct., 1895
https://digital.la84.org/digital/col...id/53099/rec/2

Last edited by Drew Hause; 11-08-2023 at 01:41 PM..
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.