|
11-24-2009, 04:32 PM | #23 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
11-24-2009, 04:35 PM | #24 | ||||||
|
Ok BOD, inquiring minds want to know!
|
||||||
11-24-2009, 04:41 PM | #25 | ||||||
|
Search is your friend: CLICK HERE to Read John's post not so long ago......
I'd add links to all my posts on the subject, but frankly - even I've grown weary reading all the posts I've have posted about it - except for this post, which I will read (and probably edit )..... John Last edited by John Dunkle; 11-24-2009 at 04:42 PM.. Reason: spelling miztakes |
||||||
11-24-2009, 04:41 PM | #26 | ||||||
|
Kind of funny how a post about an auction took a turn for the worst...
|
||||||
11-24-2009, 04:46 PM | #27 | ||||||
|
John,I just read your link.That pretty much spells it out. Thank You for the link....
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
11-24-2009, 04:54 PM | #28 | |||||||
|
Quote:
In fact - here are the crib notes.... 1) Kent PMs me to ask if it's OK to let folks know.. I PM Kent "You bet!!!"; 2) Kent posts his post... 3) No one replies to Kent's post... 4) Kent thinks he's done something wrong since no one answers - and EDITS his post... 5) Jim thinks there is a "plot against the CZAR" or something - and posts about the BATF, ATF, Interpol, whatever... All I know is it has NOTHING to do with WHY Kent edited his post...?? 6) Many folks realize that a mistake was made - post back along OTHER lines of subject areas (great pics, Bill..!) - which I too enjoyed... 7) Much later - John posts refuting the original post - which brings back into play Jim's first post, which most folks have already bypassed, as this thread took on another subject... 8) Dave asks John to define the BOD view - which he did when this happened (AGAIN, for the "first time") this day (it's a daily event..)... 9) John (<--"me") starts getting e-mails and PMs - like I'm the one who posted Jim's or John's note... 10) I'm still getting PMs and e-mails - and again, like this AM, have to ADMIN yet ANOTHER thread... 11) Several folks keep posting back in THIS thread - so I'm STILL getting e-mail/PMs... 12)... Well - there is no twelve. But, it's only late afternoon.... Ever seen a good deed "gone bad"? Start reading this thread from page #1 - post #1...... There - those are the crib notes from just this thread.. Want me to document the others over JUST THE LAST FEW WEEKS??? Carry on...... John |
|||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to John Dunkle For Your Post: |
11-24-2009, 05:01 PM | #29 | ||||||
|
Guy's,
I posted a non Parker in a Parker thread trying to throw you all off. I thought you guys would at least reprimand me! I could see the obvious direction this thread was headed for. John, Sorry I tried. Bill
__________________
Tiger Hunting for the man of Modest Means. "Let me hasten to explain, ere the cat people bristle their back fur,that we have nothing against little kitties who stay by the fire and restrict their diet to canned salmon. Our members wouldn't dream of shooting a cat in the lap of an elderly lady sitting in a rocking chair in the front parlor, provided the window is closed". Corey Ford |
||||||
11-24-2009, 05:02 PM | #30 | ||||||
|
OK..To get somewhat back on track here.I just checked Volume 2 of "The Parker Story" and there are 26 28 gauge guns listed with 24" barrels.That number kinda amazed me.. And there are exactly 0 .410's with 24" barrels in fact anything other than 26" barrels is pretty rare in .410
Lets stay here for awhile...OK?
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Suponski For Your Post: |
|
|