|
06-19-2023, 04:53 PM | #3 | ||||||
|
Stan, the pin which extended up from the frame immediately above the lifting lever when opening the action was modified/inproved upon in late 1874 and early 1875.
The lever mechanism was changed so that the pin no longer extended up from the frame and the frame was changed and the pin hole in the frame may seem to have not been but this is because the new design was retrofitted to some guns. In late 1874 or early 1875 the change in the bolt and bite design occured in order to better facilitate the bolt to seat more securely into the bite, hence the new tapered design. Some guns had this new design retrofitted and we have seen a few of these guns where the hole in the top of the action has been plugged but most of these examples have the later tapered bolt/bite installed. The earliest known example where there is no hole at all in the top of the frame is Parker No. 4239 but Parker No. 5395 has the hole but it is plugged. Pages 95 - 98 of The Parker Story explain the changes in the lifter designs. Above, ArtS gives an example of the modification retrofit to such a Parker. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
06-19-2023, 05:58 PM | #4 | ||||||
|
I appreciate the help there Art & Dean,
I thought it would be fun to have one of those pin guns, thanks for pointing out where to find that Dean, much appreciated. Stan |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Stan Hoover For Your Post: |
06-19-2023, 09:19 PM | #5 | |||||||
|
The one I mentioned (without going and checking) is 40xx. It definitely has the old style lifter (I tried a newer style and it wouldn't work) but the top hole is filled and barely visible in the metal surface. The old lifter works so it must have been shortened. That's why I think it was factory modified when assembled.
Quote:
|
|||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Arthur Shaffer For Your Post: |
Barrel Lug Frame Size Marking |
06-20-2023, 01:18 AM | #6 | ||||||
|
Barrel Lug Frame Size Marking
Thanks again Dean for pointing me in the right direction on learning more about the design changes on these Lifters.
So after reading some more this evening, I read ( In 1877, and perhaps earlier, Parker started marking the size of the gun’s frame on the bottom surface of the rear barrel lug. Now it makes sense that there was no frame size on the barrel lug of the lifter that I’m looking to bring back to life, it is serial #5710 (1875), and the second set of barrels (late 1876) that I’m adding are marked as a 2 frame. This would also make sense why the gun serial #3130 (1874) that Todd Allen was offering is also not stamped/marked with a frame size. Stan |
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Stan Hoover For Your Post: |
06-23-2023, 01:24 PM | #7 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
06-23-2023, 01:29 PM | #8 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Stan Hoover For Your Post: |
06-23-2023, 01:48 PM | #9 | ||||||
|
Here’s my 1875 10 gauge D Lifter No. 5949 with no evidence of it ever having been drilled for a pin.
It’s a 3 frame as measured from center to center on the firing pins…. The lug is unmarked. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
06-23-2023, 03:34 PM | #10 | ||||||
|
Stan, I could always adopt you, that way I could hand down my pin lifter to you. 12B/14ga. Laminated barrels and a straight grip. 1" spacing between the firing pin holes!
|
||||||
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post: |
|
|