|
12-18-2023, 08:01 PM | #3 | ||||||
|
Art, it's possible the right hammer may be a replacement. How does it compare to the left hammer? The hammers should be numbered on the inner side but you'd have to remove them to see. Regardless, it was a good buy!
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to David Noble For Your Post: |
12-18-2023, 09:53 PM | #4 | ||||||
|
The hammer pictured is not original. Just so that you know.
I really like the back action guns.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
12-18-2023, 10:25 PM | #5 | ||||||
|
yep you made a good buy...the back action guns are lot s of fun to shoot if worthy...i have 3 back actions 2 ten ga. and one 11 ga....they all shoot fine no chokes but at reasonable range they get the job done...have fun with yours and i see it s a low serial no...........charlie
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to charlie cleveland For Your Post: |
12-18-2023, 11:31 PM | #6 | ||||||
|
I wasn't sure about the hammers. I did notice that the right one was a little out of line with the left.
I hope when I am 150 that I still have two hammers. |
||||||
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Arthur Shaffer For Your Post: |
12-19-2023, 12:21 PM | #7 | ||||||
|
Non matching hammers is a common issue with early guns. Very nice example regardless
__________________
Whoever said you can't buy happiness forgot little puppies. Gene Hill |
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mills Morrison For Your Post: |
12-19-2023, 10:13 PM | #8 | ||||||
|
That is a nice back action Art! I find a lot of the back actions have cut barrels. So that fact that you have the 30" barrels is a win. Like others have said there something about a Parker Back Action...they just have nice lines.
I have a few, but I have struggled to find one with full length barrels in a 12 gauge. I have a 12 with 26" barrels I have 2 in 12b that have full length barrels. A few 14 gauges as well and 1 10 gauge. I have shot most of them, but it's a production with the odd gauges(though still fun and worth it). A nice original 12 Back Action is certainly on my list. I am glad you found one, let us know how she shoots. I think you will really enjoy it. Several of mine have decarbonized barrels as well and although that is likely the "weakest" barrel steel, I have enjoyed mine with light smokeless and black powder. I just recently got a case for my back actions, here is a quick pic... Thanks for sharing, you got me looking for a 12... |
||||||
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Jay Oliver For Your Post: |
12-19-2023, 11:19 PM | #9 | ||||||
|
Thanks Jay. I am going to have to get my old macro setup out and start taking better pictures. I, like everyone else, try to get by with a high quality phone camera but it just doesn't cut the mustard. This gun, as I stated, is in really pretty nice shape. What looks to be rough and corroded areas on the metal are really just dark and stained areas that are really in quite a smooth and polished condition with some faint smooth CC left and more on the interior metal. The bores as I noted have some mild to moderate pitting, and my experience with other old doubles and wall thickness measurements lead me to think I could remove the pitting and still have safe barrels, but I won't do that unless I am comfortable that safe mwt readings for damascus would apply to decarbonized steel. As noted, I luckily have a set of new custom Briley tubes in 28 Ga made for a 12 ga 2-1/2" chamber. I will likely leave the barrels as-is and shoot RST 2-1/2" Lite loads in it.
Your picture picture brought to mind that I have a circa 1870 mahogany case very similar to yours for one gun. It came with a high grade 12 gauge Belgium percussion double from that period that I bought at auction. My case is a single gun model for 30" and this gun may well fit in it. I just a few minutes ago realised I didn't check the online list, but surprisingly they show info available in the records for this gun. I have ordered a letter. I also ordered a letter for another early Parker being shipped today. It is an 1879 Lifter model that I think of as a transitional 3rd style. It is a third style lifter with a wedge fore end. TPS refers to it as a 3a style in the picture of all the hammer styles shown in TPS and the serialization book. I bought it because it is a style I didn't have and it is a LAM2 grade. While the pictures show no barrel finish left, it is a LAM2 in the serialization book and has a laminated marked barrel with a circle P on the barrel flats, so I will likely get them refinished. That also gives me 5 of the 6 iterations of hammer guns in my gun room. I will be looking for a representative top lever hammer gun to complete the set (I have an 1882 type 4 already). For some reason the front action first model guns were never delineated as a separate type or subtype. I suppose that was because they were not a sequential change but made concurrently. The set which duplicates the photo in TPS would make a good display set. especially since two of the six will have Parker Laminate barrels. |
||||||
12-20-2023, 08:38 PM | #10 | ||||||
|
Art, I don't have that top lever iteration either. My favorite Parker hammer gun model is the later lifters with the longer receiver and check hook barrels. I have a 3 frame 12 in that configuration made in 1893 I just love...
On the back actions, let's put a shoot/event together. I think that would be a lot of fun and get these guns out for others to see and learn. I would be happy to help with that. |
||||||
|
|