|
07-02-2024, 03:51 AM | #3 | ||||||
|
The 1 1/4 ounce proof would usually indicate more than 2 1/2" chambers. What is the bore diameter? Is it still .719?
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
07-02-2024, 08:35 AM | #4 | ||||||
|
Have the wall thickness measured. It does not appear to have been London or Birmingham reproofed for 70mm or 2&3/4 as required in the UK. Good luck.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to john pulis For Your Post: |
07-02-2024, 10:14 AM | #5 | ||||||
|
The picture isn’t super clear to me. It looks like it has a British reproof mark on it. I can’t tell, but does that a 5 ton mark? Anyway, have the bores measured to be safe.
Ken |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Ken Hill For Your Post: |
07-02-2024, 10:33 AM | #6 | ||||||
|
2 1/2" chamber, 1 1/4 ounce original proof barrels are not unknown, but are unusual.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
07-02-2024, 11:21 AM | #7 | ||||||
|
It was originally proved 1925-1954 with 2 1/2" chambers for 1 1/4 oz.
1 1/4 oz. would be the standard for 2 3/4" chambers for a max. service load of 3 3/8 Dr. Eq. with 1 1/4 oz. shot with a pressure of 3 1/2 tons = 10,640 psi Bores then were 15/1 or .685" - .692" It was reproved (Crown over R) 1954-1989 by the London Proof House (the arm and sword over NP, but prior to application of the date code mark which started in 1972) still with 2 1/2" chambers for THREE Tons; now with a bore of .719". 3 TONS would be the standard for 2 1/2" chambers with a max. service pressure of about 9000 psi That is substantial honing so wall thickness measurements are critical.
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home Last edited by Drew Hause; 07-02-2024 at 04:09 PM.. |
||||||
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post: |
07-02-2024, 11:37 AM | #8 | ||||||
|
Thank you Drew, That is the information I was hoping not to get, but expecting.
I'll pass on this one Thanks again, Dave |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Tercek For Your Post: |
07-02-2024, 12:07 PM | #9 | ||||||
|
The short answer is that it was in proof sometime before 1989 after the barrels were opened approximately 3 gauges. As everyone said, you must measure the walls. It could be very thin as reproofed, and may have been honed again for some reason. My bet is that you will find some very thin barrel walls at some point, particularly in the front half.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Arthur Shaffer For Your Post: |
07-02-2024, 04:11 PM | #10 | ||||||
|
I edited my post. The application of the date code mark by the London Proof House started in 1972 so the gun was reproved prior to then, and bad things happen to barrels in > 50 years.
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home |
||||||
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post: |
|
|