|
10-04-2021, 06:16 PM | #3 | ||||||
|
Thanks Rick, I probably am being a little to optimistic that it may have been originally a flintlock. It really doesn't matter as I am excited about it and can't wait to shoot it.
The wide stock near the breach and trigger guard is very similar to some other early 1800s flintlocks I had seen. And it looks like the breach blocks may have been milled for the drums. I would imagine though, when percussion locks/caps first were developed they were fitted to what would have be flintlock guns. I am going try an break a few targets with this one over the weekend... |
||||||
10-04-2021, 08:58 PM | #4 | ||||||
|
Nice one Jay. It is fun to bring these old muzzleloaders back into service. Think about the fact this gun could easily be 200 years old. Amazing in my mind.
__________________
"Where would a minister be without the help of sin, or the dry without alcohol?" Gene Hill Shotgunner's Notebook "May the honkers fly low and slow." Douglas Bandemer |
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Matt Buckley For Your Post: |
10-04-2021, 09:55 PM | #5 | ||||||
|
It may well have been a flintlock as noted by the drum and nipple means of ignition. That was a common means of conversion from flintlock to percussion lock. Had it originally been a percussion they would probably have used a patent breech in which the fire from the cap would go directly into the shotgun chamber as opposed to making a right angle turn as in the drum and nipple. Patent breech ignition is a fair amount faster and often more reliable
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Jim Beilke For Your Post: |
10-04-2021, 10:00 PM | #6 | ||||||
|
Matt, if you saw these bores you would be amazed, silver and shiny for the most part. Staudenmayer died in 1834 so it is at least 187 years old. He is probably better known for his airguns at the time. He also made some flintlock pistols and single barrel rifles/fowlers.
I'll post some pictures/video when I shoot it |
||||||
10-04-2021, 10:22 PM | #7 | ||||||
|
I bet she shoots just fine...charlie
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to charlie cleveland For Your Post: |
10-04-2021, 10:31 PM | #8 | ||||||
|
That's a beauty, Jay. 32" smallbores are lovely, regardless the type ignition. Please grace us with some more pics later.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Stan Hillis For Your Post: |
10-05-2021, 02:45 AM | #9 | ||||||
|
I’ve got a double MacFarlane 10 gauge we’ve had for about twenty years . I worked up okay buckshot loads with it but had a hard time keeping the overshot card tight in the second barrel after the first shot . I also worked towards a slug in one barrel but I couldn’t get POA and POI at 30 yards to be close . I went as high as 90 or so grains of 777 2Fg . I had to stop that endeavor as my shoulder was growing a permenant knot from the recoil . The slugs were 730 grains . I shot it a couple times with 1 1/2 ounces of shot and it broke targets well enough but I never was comfortable with the overshot card staying put in the left after firing the right .
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines ! |
||||||
10-05-2021, 09:15 AM | #10 | ||||||
|
Craig, I ordered some 18 gauge overshot cards and wads from Track of the Wolf as 20 gauge cards/wads didn't feel quite tight enough. There is definitely some variation in bore sizes in these older guns. My only recommendation is to try 9 or 8 gauge cards/wads in your gun if you haven't already.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Oliver For Your Post: |
|
|