|
01-08-2014, 04:45 PM | #3 | ||||||
|
Extremely early Parker hammerless guns were crosshatched at the factory. I would expect that any Parker with well done crosshatching should be considered "factory" unless something else about the gun sends a negative signal. Since the water table is not a moving part, I assume the crosshatching in that area is decorative.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
01-08-2014, 04:48 PM | #4 | ||||||
|
Thanks for the information. Of course it is hard to say but it did look like factory work in the photo.
Dennis |
||||||
01-08-2014, 05:51 PM | #5 | ||||||
|
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE |
||||||
01-08-2014, 05:58 PM | #6 | ||||||
|
I believe that Austin wrote an article on cross hatching for the Parker Pages. I don't remember the volume.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Jeff Kuss For Your Post: |
01-08-2014, 06:47 PM | #7 | ||||||
|
Cross hatching is a great way to help oil retention.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
01-08-2014, 09:33 PM | #8 | ||||||
|
I have seen it before and it could be factory. Of course, a particular one being looked at could also be an addition.
Another thing that Parker did was a kind of sunburst pattern on the breech face of barrels. It is not often seen on guns other than ones in higher original condition. image.jpg
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
01-08-2014, 10:14 PM | #9 | |||||||
|
Quote:
Or where it has been applied on a set of barrels to make them appear to be in higher "original" condition. |
|||||||
01-08-2014, 10:23 PM | #10 | ||||||
|
The gun in question is an early hammerless DH (see the posting 2 Barrel Sets) and Charlie Herzog wrote about a possible reason for the cross hatch pattern in volume 18, issue 1 from spring 2011.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Todd Kaltenbach For Your Post: |
|
|