|
11-01-2009, 02:28 PM | #3 | ||||||
|
Hi Ray..
As David mentions - on this forum we use our real names (as it states multiple times during the pre-registration and registration process ). If you PM me or post your last name - I'll get your account set, OK?? As well - welcome to the Forum - and as David also mentions - please post pics! John |
||||||
11-01-2009, 03:35 PM | #4 | ||||||
|
David and John
So sorry. I wasn't paying attention. On other Forums I'm in it is fashionable to have a catchy name. I did not follow the instructions!!!!! Hopefully John has rec'd my PM so that my account can be corrected. Raymond Michael Masciarella II (with a name that long you now know whay I prefer "Ray") |
||||||
11-01-2009, 03:36 PM | #5 | ||||||
|
Hi Ray!
I just got your PM - and you are all set! I will also tell you that your note put a slight grin on my old face, as I too - sometimes forget to read the instructions.. HEH!! Anyway - you are all set, Sir - and with my thanks! Just remember - your new login name is: Ray Masciarella If you have any difficulties at all posting pictures or logging on - please let me know, OK? In the meantime..... Welcome!!!! John |
||||||
11-01-2009, 03:49 PM | #6 | ||||||
|
Hello Ray and Welcome: You say your guns are "high grade". It would help to know which grade and also the serial numbers. Have you obtained a factory letter on them yet? Are they tight and on face? Are the bores without pitting? It is my opinion that if they are only worn of finish from use and the wood is sound but with handling marks, I would not have them refinished. If they need the mechanics looked at I would have that done only by a competent Parker smith. In my humble opinion cosmetic restoration of a high grade Parker will not enhance the value or the utility........George
|
||||||
11-01-2009, 04:06 PM | #7 | ||||||
|
Thank you George!
They are AH's circa 1890's. Are tight and on face. One with pitted bores. Nothing that can't be fixed. I do have letters. I would not just do cosmetics but rather a complete, professional restoration vs. a mere "refinish", ie the whole 9 yards. Ray |
||||||
11-01-2009, 04:36 PM | #8 | ||||||
|
Ray: You have some very nice & valuable Parkers. If the one with pitted bores has sufficient wall thickness you would want to get that one professionally honed. Otherwise I would get some expert opinions from knowledgeable Parker people before doing a "restoration". I the collector's arena originality is everything and a restored gun is still a restored gun.
Just My Humble Opinion.....George |
||||||
11-01-2009, 06:11 PM | #9 | ||||||
|
Thanks George. What is your "expert" opinion. A gun with no finish is always a gun with no finish, and a restored gun is always a restored gun. Thus, the two evils so to speak.
I see restored guns selling for quite a bit money? Sure takes a few bucks to do it correct. Sounds like your advice is to leave well enough alone? |
||||||
11-01-2009, 06:37 PM | #10 | ||||||
|
You did not indicate where you lived, but with significant guns a person should not act quickly. My suggestion is to bring them to a PGCA gathering place, such as the Southern in April or the annual meeting in September. Lots of nice guns have been harmed by bad case color jobs, machine buffed barrel refinishes, varnished stocks and repointed checkering done with contemporary angles. On pitted barrels for example, lots of times pits can mostly be polished out without rehoning. Rehoning cuts away metal and reduces barrel wall thickness, usually by 006 or so. The pits are usually only cosmetic and newly shiny bores always raise concerns for me.
I'd leave it alone until people who know Parkers got to look at it and you got a variety of opinions. |
||||||
|
|