Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Nice English hammer gun. Out of proof?
Unread 07-01-2024, 08:28 PM   #1
Member
terc
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 287
Thanks: 260
Thanked 337 Times in 101 Posts

Default Nice English hammer gun. Out of proof?

I looked at a very nice English hammer gun today. It is priced low. The gun does not have a makers name. The chambers measure 2 3/4" with my Galazan gauge. Everything I see on the barrel flats shows 2 1/2" proof.
Am I correct?
Thanks Dave
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 07780871-E6F3-4DBB-847D-1E5BB38C781D.jpg (486.0 KB, 38 views)
Dave Tercek is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-01-2024, 09:03 PM   #2
Member
Keith Sirmans
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 419
Thanks: 592
Thanked 269 Times in 145 Posts

Default

If the barrels have plenty of material left and no big pits get it and go shoot the thing.
__________________
"I shall pass this way but once. Any good that I can do or any kindness that I can show to any human being let me do it now. Let me not defer nor neglect it, for I shall not pass this way again."
Keith Sirmans is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Keith Sirmans For Your Post:
Unread 07-02-2024, 03:51 AM   #3
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,949
Thanks: 6,387
Thanked 9,262 Times in 4,936 Posts

Default

The 1 1/4 ounce proof would usually indicate more than 2 1/2" chambers. What is the bore diameter? Is it still .719?
Bill Murphy is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 07-02-2024, 08:35 AM   #4
Member
john pulis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 628
Thanks: 1,655
Thanked 279 Times in 194 Posts

Default

Have the wall thickness measured. It does not appear to have been London or Birmingham reproofed for 70mm or 2&3/4 as required in the UK. Good luck.
john pulis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to john pulis For Your Post:
Unread 07-02-2024, 10:14 AM   #5
Member
Ken Hill
PGCA Member
 
Ken Hill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 738
Thanks: 958
Thanked 773 Times in 383 Posts

Default

The picture isn’t super clear to me. It looks like it has a British reproof mark on it. I can’t tell, but does that a 5 ton mark? Anyway, have the bores measured to be safe.

Ken
Ken Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ken Hill For Your Post:
Unread 07-02-2024, 10:33 AM   #6
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,949
Thanks: 6,387
Thanked 9,262 Times in 4,936 Posts

Default

2 1/2" chamber, 1 1/4 ounce original proof barrels are not unknown, but are unusual.
Bill Murphy is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 07-02-2024, 11:21 AM   #7
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,176
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,997 Times in 1,308 Posts

Default

It was originally proved 1925-1954 with 2 1/2" chambers for 1 1/4 oz.
1 1/4 oz. would be the standard for 2 3/4" chambers for a max. service load of 3 3/8 Dr. Eq. with 1 1/4 oz. shot with a pressure of 3 1/2 tons = 10,640 psi
Bores then were 15/1 or .685" - .692"

It was reproved (Crown over R) 1954-1989 by the London Proof House (the arm and sword over NP, but prior to application of the date code mark which started in 1972) still with 2 1/2" chambers for THREE Tons; now with a bore of .719". 3 TONS would be the standard for 2 1/2" chambers with a max. service pressure of about 9000 psi

That is substantial honing so wall thickness measurements are critical.


Last edited by Drew Hause; 07-02-2024 at 04:09 PM..
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 07-02-2024, 11:37 AM   #8
Member
terc
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 287
Thanks: 260
Thanked 337 Times in 101 Posts

Default

Thank you Drew, That is the information I was hoping not to get, but expecting.
I'll pass on this one
Thanks again, Dave
Dave Tercek is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Tercek For Your Post:
Unread 07-02-2024, 12:07 PM   #9
Member
ArtS
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 930
Thanks: 84
Thanked 1,323 Times in 490 Posts

Default

The short answer is that it was in proof sometime before 1989 after the barrels were opened approximately 3 gauges. As everyone said, you must measure the walls. It could be very thin as reproofed, and may have been honed again for some reason. My bet is that you will find some very thin barrel walls at some point, particularly in the front half.
Arthur Shaffer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Arthur Shaffer For Your Post:
Unread 07-02-2024, 04:11 PM   #10
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,176
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,997 Times in 1,308 Posts

Default

I edited my post. The application of the date code mark by the London Proof House started in 1972 so the gun was reproved prior to then, and bad things happen to barrels in > 50 years.
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.