Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Receiver variation question
Unread 12-16-2013, 01:53 PM   #1
Member
David Noble
PGCA Member
 
David Noble's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 946
Thanks: 1,399
Thanked 1,144 Times in 409 Posts

Default Receiver variation question

I was looking at Ron Scores album and ran across these images of the receiver of his GH(?) grade 12ga on a 1/2 frame. Interesting gun, what with the extra engraving and checkering. But that is not what caught my attention. Observe in the picture the slots cut in the joint end of the receiver, and the pins that are on each side near the pivot pin. I have seen this before but I don't understand why this feature was used. Any help?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 84025_receiver.jpg (147.7 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg 84025 rec2.jpg (155.2 KB, 17 views)
David Noble is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2013, 02:10 PM   #2
Member
DoubleOframe
PGCA Member
 
Channing Will's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 89
Thanks: 18
Thanked 77 Times in 37 Posts

Default

If I had to guess I would say the frame has been machined for an ejector mechanism.

Maybe modified for the patented ejector mechanism below?
Channing Will is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Channing Will For Your Post:
Visit Channing Will's homepage!
Unread 12-16-2013, 02:20 PM   #3
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,718
Thanks: 494
Thanked 18,356 Times in 4,724 Posts

Default

Some engraving on that frame!

Looks to be an aftermarket ejector system. The slots would be for trips sticking out from the forend and the pins would be what trips them.

Deffinately an addition to an extractor gun since this frame has an extractor style roll joint in it.

I believe I have seen other guns with aftermarket ejectors that utilize pins just in from of the roll joint pin. But I do not know of what type they are.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 12-16-2013, 03:42 PM   #4
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,694
Thanks: 1,717
Thanked 8,115 Times in 2,433 Posts

Default

Here are pictures the late Dr. Gaddy sent me of a Parker he owned with Moran & Wolfersperger ejectors --





Something is amiss in the original post. That certainly isn't a GH-grade pictured and Moran & Wolfersperger were 30 years gone when the 1/2 frames appeared.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 12-16-2013, 05:08 PM   #5
Member
DoubleOframe
PGCA Member
 
Channing Will's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 89
Thanks: 18
Thanked 77 Times in 37 Posts

Default

I just browsed through Ron's album and noticed the forend iron is a standard non-ejector iron but appears to be cyanide case colored. The barrels also appear to be newer barrels with Parker Overload Proofs. The serial number puts it at 1896 production so my guess is it went to have ejector fitted by Moran & Wolfersperger at some point in its life and then later went back to Parker for new barrels. Parker probably said we dont fit new barrels to non-factory added ejector systems so they replaced the forend iron as well.
Channing Will is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Channing Will For Your Post:
Visit Channing Will's homepage!
Unread 12-16-2013, 05:40 PM   #6
Member
David Noble
PGCA Member
 
David Noble's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 946
Thanks: 1,399
Thanked 1,144 Times in 409 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Noreen View Post
Something is amiss in the original post. That certainly isn't a GH-grade pictured and Moran & Wolfersperger were 30 years gone when the 1/2 frames appeared.
Hey, I don't just make this stuff up!

Here is a picture of the water table of 84025. It has a "G" and a "2".
http://parkerguns.org/forums/album.p...pictureid=2868

Note also the Fleur de Lis points on the stock are just line engraved in the wood and the "A" or "B" style checking does'nt look to be factory. No mullered borders.
http://parkerguns.org/forums/album.p...pictureid=2891

I agree with DoubleOframe that the barrels were supplied as non ejector for the reason he states. I'm sure the receiver is a
"1" size due to its dimensions and date of manufacture. Remington just used "1/2" frame size replacement barrels to fit to the gun.

Still this is a very unique gun that I wish were mine.

Here is the link to Ron's album of this fine gun.
http://parkerguns.org/forums/album.php?albumid=276

Last edited by David Noble; 12-16-2013 at 06:07 PM.. Reason: Clarification
David Noble is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2013, 06:36 PM   #7
Member
Fishtail
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 789
Thanks: 63
Thanked 509 Times in 253 Posts

Default

There has to be a story behind that 'G'. Either it began life as a G and was reincarnated as something higher before it left the factory, or it was the personal gun of one of the engravers, or .......
greg conomos is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2013, 08:08 PM   #8
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,925
Thanks: 36,396
Thanked 33,921 Times in 12,560 Posts

Default

If it is an 1896 gun it certainly can't be a 1/2-frame.

I believe the 1-frame and the 1/2-frame guns share the same firing pin spacing and my guess is that the gun is a 1-frame.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2013, 08:51 PM   #9
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,694
Thanks: 1,717
Thanked 8,115 Times in 2,433 Posts

Default

Dave,

I'm sure you don't!!

Quote:
Hey, I don't just make this stuff up!
I made my comments before I went back and looked at all of the Ron Scores pictures of 84025. Very interesting gun. Obviousdly has had a long and varied life. Reminds me a bit of the BH(E) 20-gauge, 84040 that was passed around the Spokane Gun Club not too long ago.

Dave
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2013, 11:26 PM   #10
Member
David Noble
PGCA Member
 
David Noble's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 946
Thanks: 1,399
Thanked 1,144 Times in 409 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Noreen View Post
Dave,

Very interesting gun. Obviousdly has had a long and varied life. Reminds me a bit of the BH(E) 20-gauge, 84040 that was passed around the Spokane Gun Club not too long ago.

Dave
Yes! I was thinking the same thing! By the way, I'm the current caretaker of 84040 .

David
David Noble is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.