Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Hammer Guns

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Lifter question
Unread 02-05-2022, 04:47 PM   #1
Member
Harry Schlott
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 18
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts

Default Lifter question

Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone can shed some light on a lifter I'm looking at.
The barrel rib says Parker Bros. plain steel. The barrel flats Has an S with a crescent above and below, with a 4 8 barrel weight? There is a 0 with an s on the barrel lug. Serial Number 5385.
The fella that is selling says it's a 12 ga. but was wondering if it could be a 16 ga. Not sure what the S signifies. Any info would be greatly appreciated
Thanks,
Harry
Harry Schlott is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-05-2022, 05:56 PM   #2
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,058
Thanks: 36,753
Thanked 34,179 Times in 12,641 Posts

Default

Parker shotgun no. 5385 shows as a PS U 0 12 30 so it is in fact a 12 gauge.
359 Parkers are listed as PS which is as you see on the rib, Plain Steel.
the S with the crescent above and below is the stamp for this barrel steel.
The 4 with the smaller 8 is the pre-struck barrel weight, 4 lbs., 8 oz.
The U in the Action Type column is (arguably) for Underlifter.
The 0 with the s are inspection stamps most likely.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 02-05-2022, 07:07 PM   #3
Member
Harry Schlott
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 18
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts

Default

Thanks Dean, Very helpful. So when they refer to Plain steel , is it still twisted/ Laminated?
I don't see any kind of pattern

BTW Dean, I too am a setter man. ; )

Last edited by Harry Schlott; 02-05-2022 at 07:22 PM..
Harry Schlott is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-05-2022, 07:22 PM   #4
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,058
Thanks: 36,753
Thanked 34,179 Times in 12,641 Posts

Default

None of the above. Just like it says, plain steel not composite. All of the Twists, Laminateds, Damascus, etc. are composite meaning composed of layers or bundles of iron and steel twisted and hammer-welded together and wound around a mandrel to form a tube. Plain steel is not one of those.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-05-2022, 08:37 PM   #5
Member
winplumber
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,655
Thanks: 1,817
Thanked 646 Times in 409 Posts

Default

Was Plain steel a fluid steel and was it stronger than composite barrels
Steve Huffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-05-2022, 09:17 PM   #6
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,058
Thanks: 36,753
Thanked 34,179 Times in 12,641 Posts

Default

I don't have the answer to that Steve. Others do though.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 02-05-2022, 09:29 PM   #7
Member
Bruce P Bruner
PGCA Member
 
Bruce P Bruner's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 526
Thanks: 1,219
Thanked 1,988 Times in 365 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Huffman View Post
Was Plain steel a fluid steel and was it stronger than composite barrels
That is a very interesting question, however I will not speculate. Perhaps those that have studied the writings of Sherman Bell would care to elaborate.
Bruce P Bruner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce P Bruner For Your Post:
Unread 02-05-2022, 09:48 PM   #8
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,058
Thanks: 36,753
Thanked 34,179 Times in 12,641 Posts

Default

Dr. Drew Haus will have the documentation on that or will direct us to it.






.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 02-06-2022, 09:18 PM   #9
Member
todd allen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 2,035
Thanked 3,366 Times in 1,158 Posts

Default

From my studies, I think I would trust Damascus or twist over the fluid steel of the same era.
todd allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-06-2022, 10:29 PM   #10
Member
Jay Oliver
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Jay Oliver's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 1,382
Thanked 3,346 Times in 675 Posts

Default

I believe Parker started out calling these decarbonized steel barrels, but Remington was already using that name so Parker switched and used the term plain steel later on.

I also believe that the Parker Decarbonized steel/Plain steel barrels are not as strong as other barrels Parker made(they can withstand the least amount of pressure) as already mentioned. Having said that, if minimum wall thickness is not an issue, there are people who shoot these with light loads.

I have a back action lifter, #171 with decarbonized steel barrels that, I will shoot RST 3/4 Falcon Ultralights as well as my own 3/4oz. reloads. I have also shot square 1oz. black powder loads.
Jay Oliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.