Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-04-2011, 04:45 AM   #11
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,866
Thanks: 1,645
Thanked 4,804 Times in 1,370 Posts

Default

Thanks Dean I said the same thing to Scott when he stopped by after work to look at it. If only the guns could talk. It is not going to suffer the same fate at my house
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-04-2011, 12:36 PM   #12
Member
Richard Flanders
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Richard Flanders's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 8,480
Thanked 5,538 Times in 1,717 Posts

Default

What a gorgeous Remington Pete! The buttplate looks like it sat for years on a carpet that was degassing high end hydrocarbons that degraded the rubber. Gorgeous gun. Dimensions would be perfect for me.
Richard Flanders is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Richard Flanders For Your Post:
Unread 02-04-2011, 01:58 PM   #13
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,866
Thanks: 1,645
Thanked 4,804 Times in 1,370 Posts

Default

Interestingly enough I have read that Remington "usually" stamped an E on the barrel tubes with the grade to indicate an ejector gun (mine has no E). However they were reported to be inconsistent with that practice. One fellow on the Doublegun site reports having seen two other 1894 extractor guns with ejector forends and no E stamping. Here is another one. I am getting a sense some extractor model 1894's may have left the factory with ejector forend iron.

http://www.auctionarms.com/search/di...emnum=10156213
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-04-2011, 02:22 PM   #14
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,640
Thanks: 35,622
Thanked 33,239 Times in 12,378 Posts

Default

That could be Pete but look at the ejector slote on the underside of the rib extension... the barrels appear to have been intended for an ejector gun too.
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-04-2011, 04:29 PM   #15
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,866
Thanks: 1,645
Thanked 4,804 Times in 1,370 Posts

Default

From the Doublegun BBS:

"Originally Posted By: Ithaca16
I have collected Remington 1894 and 1900 for over 35 year's.And also gunsmithing work on them all that time. The forend look's normal on this gun. The large opening at the end of the forend is on both extractor and auto ejector gun's. The ejector forend has some more milling that must be done to the back sides and at the end the fit the ejector parts,hammers ,springs, etc. Some time's an extractor gun will have a forend iron on it that is milled out for the ejector parts. Maby one in 20 gun's. The extractor is normal on this gun,those two slots are on both extractor and auto ejector guns. Terry"


I Just got back from the local gun club where I met Scott who measured the gun and we put a couple of off hand test shots on paper.

Chambers 2 7/8"

Bores - L .796, R .803

Chokes - L .045, R .048 Both chokes start their taper 6 to 7 inches before the muzzle.

Wall thickness 6" ahead of breech R - .128, L - .127

Wall thickness before the chokes R - .040, L - .042

Shot offhand with 1 1/4 ounce lead 6 74% at 40 yards. 72% with 1 1/8 ounce 7.5's
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Unread 02-04-2011, 08:42 PM   #16
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,795 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

those ducks are in trouble with that gun.... charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to charlie cleveland For Your Post:
Unread 03-29-2012, 07:20 PM   #17
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,609
Thanks: 1,633
Thanked 7,836 Times in 2,363 Posts

Default

I agree with the post quoted from Terry (Ithaca16) that this gun has always been an extractor gun. That is just the way Remington did it, using the same forearm iron for both extractor and ejector guns.

By a few years into the production of the Remington Hammerless Double Barrel Shotgun, the extra cost for ejectors was down to $5. When the guns were introduced in the October 1894 Remington Arms Co. catalogue, ejectors were $22.50 extra, and were still that in the November 1895 catalogue. I don't have a catalogue for 1896, but by the April 1897, Remington Arms Co. catalogue, that introduces Ordnance Steel and Remington Steel barrels, the price of ejectors is dropped to $5. The catalogue in the fall of 1897 adds the 16-gauge guns to the offerings. From beginning to end, the Remington Arms Co. catalogues state that the B-/BE-Grade came with "Fine three-stripe Damascus barrels". But, here we have B-/BE-Grades with "Etoile 3 B.P." and "Boston 2 S.J.", while my BE-Grade 12-gauge of 1895-vintage has "Chain J." barrels --

Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 03-30-2012, 08:51 AM   #18
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,866
Thanks: 1,645
Thanked 4,804 Times in 1,370 Posts

Default

Thanks Dave, your knowledge of such things is appreciated. Beautiful pattern on your barrels. In spite of the lack of ejectors and Boston 2S.J on my gun I realize that my 1894 10 bore B grade is on the rare side and in high condition. I have gained a lot or respect for the Remington 1894 after owning and shooting this gun for a little more than a year. Remington built a quality double yet somehow missed being recognized as one of the American classic's.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-30-2012, 09:11 AM   #19
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Pete,

Remington dropped production of their SxS's in favor or those new fangled pumps and the Remington built Browning Auto 5, the Remongton Model 11. At the time it was probably a good business decision. Look at all the Remington pumps and autoloaders that have been built at a profit for Remington!

I've recently gained an appreciation for the Remington 1894 SxS after seeing a friend's Bachelder-restored 1894's, a 12 gauge chain Damascus and a 10 gauge. Wow! Those long actions look fantastic with new case colors!

Mark
__________________
Don't hunt with a gun that will embarrass your dog!

USMC Retired
USMC Distinguished Marksman
USMC Distinguished Pistol Shot
NRA Benefactor - Ring of Freedom member
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.