Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
2 1/2 vs 2 3/4
Unread 08-05-2014, 08:02 AM   #1
Member
MIKE FISHER
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 53
Thanks: 22
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

Default 2 1/2 vs 2 3/4

This question has probably been beat to death in previous threads, so feel free to direct me to those. I have my great grandfather's fluid steel VH w/2 5/8" chambers, measured w/Galazan gauge. Do I need to use 2 1/2" ammo in it, or will 2 3/4 suffice?

IF 2 3/4 is OK, and I would only use regular field loads and target loads, are paper hulls necessary?
MIKE FISHER is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-05-2014, 08:18 AM   #2
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,769
Thanks: 610
Thanked 2,577 Times in 926 Posts

Default

Most low velocity/low pressure 2 3/4" loads will be fine. And in this case skivved plastic cases, like Win AA or STS, are preferable to paper.
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Campbell For Your Post:
Unread 08-05-2014, 08:39 AM   #3
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,063
Thanks: 36,762
Thanked 34,192 Times in 12,643 Posts

Default

Your VH was made for use with 2 3/4" shells. The original hang tag would have made that statement. Chambers were cut 1/8" shorter than the length of the shell to be used for the purpose of a better gas seal.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 08-05-2014, 08:44 AM   #4
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,780
Thanks: 503
Thanked 18,627 Times in 4,774 Posts

Default

You will have no issues with 2-3/4" plastic shells.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 08-05-2014, 09:27 AM   #5
Member
MIKE FISHER
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 53
Thanks: 22
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

Default

Thanks. Very good news in that AA is my hull of choice.
MIKE FISHER is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-05-2014, 09:28 AM   #6
Member
MIKE FISHER
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 53
Thanks: 22
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

Default

Great to know. Had previously heard that the shorter chamber might cause unacceptable pressure rise. Appreciate the help.
MIKE FISHER is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-05-2014, 09:30 AM   #7
Member
MIKE FISHER
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 53
Thanks: 22
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

Default

Thanks for saving me a good deal of time, effort and money. Much appreciated.
MIKE FISHER is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-05-2014, 10:05 AM   #8
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,664 Times in 2,672 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Campbell View Post
Most low velocity/low pressure 2 3/4" loads will be fine. And in this case skivved plastic cases, like Win AA or STS, are preferable to paper.
What is the factual basis for this statement? Any Parker documents to support it ?

What specific pressures and velocities do you mean and what is the source of that information ?

And why are paper shells such as Federals inappropriate ?
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-05-2014, 10:10 AM   #9
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,769
Thanks: 610
Thanked 2,577 Times in 926 Posts

Default

BD:
With all due respect, the factual basis for my statement is threefold:

1) About 30 years of experience and tens of thousands of rounds in shooting such loads in "short" chambers of Damascus and fluid steel barrels.
2) Sherman's Bell's tests/report many years ago in Double Gun Journal.
3) Personal consultation with Tom Armbrust.


Okay, and at the risk of being tediously repetitious:

1) About any birdshot load in the 1100 - 1150 fps range. Notice I didn't say 000 buck.
2) I didn't use the word "inappropriate." I wrote "preferable." Because paper is a bit less compressible than plastic that's already skivved. But paper will still work...
3) According to Bell's and Armbrust's pressure-tested work, skivved 2 3/4" plastic hulls add about 25 psi to pressures as opposed to 2 1/2" hulls. Depending on the chamber/forcing cones of a specific gun.

For further insight, please consult Sherman Bell and/or Tom Armbrust...
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to John Campbell For Your Post:
Unread 08-05-2014, 01:21 PM   #10
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,664 Times in 2,672 Posts

Default

Parker provided plenty of documents about what they recommended. That information is stated on
1 hang tags
2 Small bore shot gun brochure
3 Parker load tables
4 Parker load table reproduced in TPS
5 Contemporary ammunition manufactures information as provided here by Dave Noreen


We have much detailed and specific information that has been reproduced here many times that is from Parker directly. Don't you feel that a questioner is entitled to know what Parker said to use with his gun instead of personal opinions ?
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.