Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
NEVER TRUST A MEC BAR
Unread 01-11-2023, 12:54 PM   #1
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,949
Thanks: 3,922
Thanked 2,665 Times in 867 Posts

Default NEVER TRUST A MEC BAR

I was loading what I thought were 1 1/8 ounce dove loads for 12 gauge on a MEC 9000. Even though the bar was 1 1/8, I noticed that the 1 1/8 ounce wads were too low, so I had to go to the 1 ounce wads. After loading a few hundred I decided to weigh the shot charges. In both 8s and 7 1/2 loads it was dropping exactly one ounce. Of course the powder was correct for the bar uses bushings. But not the shot side. One will find that all of MEC's info is light. They do sell on EBAY an aftermarket bar that uses bushings on both sides, which I did buy for my 20 ga 9000 since the 1 ounce bar does not drop 1 ounce either.

I did not have drill bits that big so using a step drill on the bottom I kept opening the bar until it dropped 1 1/8 ounce. I did not go from the top so as not to mess up the rubber in the bar. Here is the bar that now drops the true amount. If one has bigger drill bits that would work better, but hey, it works with the step drill bit.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2142.jpg (488.0 KB, 4 views)
Jerry Harlow is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jerry Harlow For Your Post:
Unread 01-11-2023, 01:14 PM   #2
Member
Woodcock survey
PGCA Member
 
Daniel Carter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 964
Thanks: 1,293
Thanked 1,388 Times in 595 Posts

Default

This has come up regularly on the reloading forum at Shotgun world. The concensus of opinion is that MEC calibrated the bars using soft shot, no antimony, which is the heaviest compared to high antimony which is lighter. Size of shot also plays into what the actual throw weight comes out. Their target bars are smaller yet in order to keep you under the required weight no matter what type shot you use. I have not found soft shot for sale for years so have no idea why they do this but the drill will fix it.
Daniel Carter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Daniel Carter For Your Post:
Unread 01-11-2023, 06:24 PM   #3
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,949
Thanks: 3,922
Thanked 2,665 Times in 867 Posts

Default

The problem is one drops the exact amount of a powder designed for 1 1/8 ounces but you are pushing only one ounce of shot, which would either require a different amount or even a completely different powder. I imagine the one ounce of shot with that powder is moving pretty fast.

I guess MEC thinks you are going to use their chart to select their recommended bushing, which will always be lighter, and are not going to weigh the powder charges and change bushings to get the exact amount.
Jerry Harlow is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-11-2023, 07:15 PM   #4
Member
Woodcock survey
PGCA Member
 
Daniel Carter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 964
Thanks: 1,293
Thanked 1,388 Times in 595 Posts

Default

C.Y.A. liability probably plays a part also.
Daniel Carter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Daniel Carter For Your Post:
Unread 01-12-2023, 10:10 AM   #5
Member
William Davis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 770 Times in 416 Posts

Default

It’s a volume measure dropping shot that varies in size and composition. Any loader same variance in drop weights are common, depending on how the shot packs and antimony content.

Ponsness Warren round drop bushings easy to open up in a lathe. Have a 3/4 & 7/8 bushing modified to drop the volume needed AA hulls shot & wad I use. Modified bushing drops are closer to 3/4 & 7/8 than factory. Mark them with a punch prick either side of the bushing # to indicate modified.

You can do the same to square MEC bars in the 4 jaw. Easiest method use a bar that drops heavy, lined with blue painters tape to desired. I use tape to check the hull-wad-shot fill before modifying . Measurement taped bushing gives a rough indication size needed to modify the 2nd bushing that’s too small. Best open in the lathe gradually sneaking up on the correct drops . In and out of the chuck several times.

I would bush out too large with tape before opening too small using less than precise machine methods. Over drill means use a new bar. Might consider keep using the taped one. Have taped bushings, volume pistol powder measure infrequently used, that lasted well, just check the drops before each loading session.

William
William Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-14-2023, 04:04 PM   #6
Member
Keith Doty
PGCA Member
 
Keith Doty's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 570
Thanks: 545
Thanked 718 Times in 293 Posts

Default

I discovered years ago that most powder and shot bushings are approximate, the shot will vary quite a bit depending on size. I'm in the habit of actually weighing a set of 5 throws out of any bushings with the intended powder or shot charge before I use them. I have several I have chucked up on the lathe and "tuned" to get exactly what I want.
Keith Doty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-14-2023, 09:34 PM   #7
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,058
Thanks: 2,905
Thanked 11,399 Times in 3,074 Posts

Default

I've stepped drilled several over the years, but the shot doesn't always fill in the upward direction, so the last two I did, I set them up in the Bridgeport and, using a boring head, bored them out straight thru, stepping out a few thous each time until they dropped what I wanted. Another method, which I considered, but haven't done, was to use an expanding reamer.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Unread 01-15-2023, 10:22 AM   #8
Member
Carl G. Bachhuber
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 73
Thanks: 0
Thanked 49 Times in 28 Posts

Default

I have modified quite a few over the years, both bars and bushings. I try to dial the bars in for the size of shot I am using. The bushings are adjusted for the type of powder and weight. For patterning I weigh both powder and shot. Some powders meter a lot better than others.
C.G.B.
Carl G. Bachhuber is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2023, 01:45 PM   #9
Member
William Davis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 770 Times in 416 Posts

Default

I could set MEC Bar up in my half Bridgeport size Rockwell mill but am better at boring on the lathe . I use the mill to tune powder drops on brass fixed rotor bonanza pistol measures. There clean the hole up with an end mill Adjust charge with depth measured with a indicator, rotors no longer available buy small ones off eBay & alter to suit
William Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-16-2023, 01:56 PM   #10
Member
Double Lab
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Daryl Corona's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,265
Thanks: 15,279
Thanked 6,085 Times in 2,380 Posts

Default

I know many here don't like them but I have used the adjustable charge bars for years with good results. Just saying.....
__________________
Wag more- Bark less.
Daryl Corona is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2023, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.