Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Reproductions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-29-2022, 04:35 PM   #11
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,530
Thanks: 5,549
Thanked 7,527 Times in 3,401 Posts

Default

He had it out on the table at Sanford all weekend .
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines !
CraigThompson is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CraigThompson For Your Post:
Unread 04-29-2022, 05:04 PM   #12
Member
Dollar
PGCA Member
 
Bob Hayes's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 752
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,073 Times in 350 Posts

Default

Yes it was there at Sanford.Its a pieced gun with his barrels installed.It looked ok but something is just off about it.
Bob Hayes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bob Hayes For Your Post:
Unread 04-29-2022, 06:56 PM   #13
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,580
Thanks: 6,149
Thanked 8,854 Times in 4,747 Posts

Default

When Tony sold .410 barrels some time back, they would install them for you or not. Not all of these barrels were installed professionally.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 05-01-2022, 08:10 AM   #14
Member
78CJ
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 128
Thanks: 17
Thanked 110 Times in 42 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Sheerin View Post
When someone is selling a gun online, one where things like wood grain are very important to the value of the gun, or even ones particluar likes or dislikes.... Sellers IMHO should always show the gun that is actually being sold. Even on new guns. I bought a gun last year, thought I was getting gun pictured, I did not. It did not say the gun was a stock photo, the wood was still nice, but it wasn't what I was expecting. I said something to them, and their response was, pretty much tough ****, we don't have time to provide exact gun pics of every gun we sell. That's ok, but it should be stated in their posting.
Same seller?
Ryan Brege is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-02-2022, 01:33 PM   #15
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,242
Thanks: 1,149
Thanked 3,617 Times in 988 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Baehman View Post
It appears to have been returned for whatever reason as it's once again available:
https://www.gunsinternational.com/gu...n_id=101928284
I just had a phone conversation with a gentleman from Georgia that originally purchased this gun from Standard Manufacturing Co. when it was offered a couple of months ago. The reason he returned it was that he found upon receipt that it was put together with aftermarket .410 barrels that Galazan offered several years ago with an original 20ga. 0-frame Repro, S/N 20-X488X stamped into the action flats. He did get his money back, but it took six weeks to get it.

Note: One might wonder if the S/N of this set of barrels or the 26-inchers that are now gone carries the same S/N to the above subject gun?
https://www.gunsamerica.com/99571984...a-Barrel-2.htm
__________________
Wild Skies
Since 1951
Greg Baehman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Greg Baehman For Your Post:
Unread 05-02-2022, 02:55 PM   #16
Member
Ken Hill
PGCA Member
 
Ken Hill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 710
Thanks: 879
Thanked 720 Times in 361 Posts

Default

I will add this...if you buy a gun from Galazan, expect it to take 4+ weeks to get your money back on the return. I told them not to ship the gun after I found out some additional information on the gun. It took 5 weeks to get the credit back on my card.

Ken
Ken Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ken Hill For Your Post:
Unread 05-07-2022, 03:53 PM   #17
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,580
Thanks: 6,149
Thanked 8,854 Times in 4,747 Posts

Default

28-.410 set just sold on Poulin's for $16,500 plus at least 18% buyer's premium. That's $19,470 plus tax and shipping. What is your opinion of a Repro compared to an original .410?
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-07-2022, 10:44 PM   #18
Member
Stan Hillis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,710
Thanks: 3,208
Thanked 3,958 Times in 1,121 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy View Post
28-.410 set just sold on Poulin's for $16,500 plus at least 18% buyer's premium. That's $19,470 plus tax and shipping. What is your opinion of a Repro compared to an original .410?
To put it bluntly, there is no comparison. My opinion, and likely not in the majority. I'm just not willing to value reproductions close to originals. I had a new '69 Camaro SS. My grandson has a 2010 Camaro SS. While his is a great car, and I like and appreciate it, it can't have the value of an original '69.
Stan Hillis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stan Hillis For Your Post:
Unread 05-08-2022, 08:06 AM   #19
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,242
Thanks: 1,149
Thanked 3,617 Times in 988 Posts

Default

David Trevallion, one of the most experienced and respected gun gurus in all the world and one that has been inside and out of some of the greatest guns the world has ever seen wrote "Parker Reproduction guns were in every respect equal - if not superior - to the originals."

Should we doubt his opinion?
__________________
Wild Skies
Since 1951
Greg Baehman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Greg Baehman For Your Post:
Unread 05-08-2022, 08:32 AM   #20
Member
Phil C
PGCA Member
 
Phillip Carr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,161
Thanks: 3,465
Thanked 5,946 Times in 1,437 Posts

Default

I would agree from a quality perspective the Reproductions are equal to or exceed the originals with a couple of exceptions like the ejector hammers. It’s the collectibility and value where there is a large separation.
Phillip Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Phillip Carr For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.