Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
A few questions for the Parker experts
Unread 04-18-2012, 07:12 PM   #1
Member
Craig Larter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Craig Larter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 3,150
Thanked 10,964 Times in 1,739 Posts

Default A few questions for the Parker experts

I have a Parker and the factory letter says it was shipped in May 20 1905. The gun has the T-type pinned wear plate that was patented 8/15/1905. The water table is not stamped with the 1905 patent date. Was the gun shipped with the 1905 wear plate or was it added at a later date?? Opinions please.
Picture below

The barrels flats have a stamp WK in a circle is this the Walter King stamp that is thought to be a barrel quality stamp?? Picture below


Also, according the TPS page519 Vol II the end of a 12 ga. chamber is .798 (C Dia. small end) Does that mean that the proper chamber length gauge for a Parker should be .798 dia.???
Thanks Craig (just trying to educate myself)
Craig Larter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-18-2012, 07:22 PM   #2
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,896
Thanks: 4,385
Thanked 4,073 Times in 1,730 Posts

Default

Craig, Many guns were retrofitted at the factory for the 1910 bolt plate. Yes the "WK" is the barrel stamp for Walter King. As far as chambers go I think the .798 is a starting point I have seen some variances in chamber diameters.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-18-2012, 08:36 PM   #3
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,898
Thanks: 6,349
Thanked 9,202 Times in 4,907 Posts

Default

Refresh our memories here, Craig. Do you have your PGCA letter yet? It may mention a return to the factory between 1905 and 1910. That could explain the early bolt plate. Otherwise, I would assume that the gun was fitted with the 1905 plate while the patent was being approved.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-18-2012, 08:44 PM   #4
Member
Craig Larter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Craig Larter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 3,150
Thanked 10,964 Times in 1,739 Posts

Default

Bill: I do have a letter and no mention of a return to the factory.
Craig Larter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-18-2012, 08:57 PM   #5
Member
charlie cleveland
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,802 Times in 3,968 Posts

Default

show us some pictures of this gun craig...looks interesting... charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-18-2012, 09:29 PM   #6
Member
Double Lab
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Daryl Corona's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,537
Thanks: 16,398
Thanked 6,794 Times in 2,605 Posts

Default

Craig,
My guess is your gun left the factory with the new wear plate. Murph is probably right. The gun was fitted with the plate with the patent pending. Also, as Dave says, I too have seen variances in chamber ID's especially with damascus/twist barrels.
Daryl Corona is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-18-2012, 09:48 PM   #7
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,959
Thanks: 36,484
Thanked 33,972 Times in 12,580 Posts

Default

A question about the removable wear plate Craig. There were two styles of "T" shaped and pinned plates, the 1905 design and the 1910 design. The 1910 plate had flats cut into the sides of the plate and the bolt was manufactured to engage the plate more positively than the 1905 design. Which design do you have?
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-19-2012, 06:35 AM   #8
Member
Craig Larter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Craig Larter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 3,150
Thanked 10,964 Times in 1,739 Posts

Default

Dean: My gun has the 1905 design, just a plain block letter "T". The newer design appears to have two tapered surfaces on the top ends of the "T", correct???
According to TPS the lowest serial number with the 1905 patent date is 131179, my gun is 131942 so it is close to the time of the change. I would guess Parkers were not assembled in exact serial number sequence. Thanks for the help Craig
Craig Larter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-19-2012, 07:28 AM   #9
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,959
Thanks: 36,484
Thanked 33,972 Times in 12,580 Posts

Default

That's right Craig and that is the 1910 patented design.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-19-2012, 09:01 AM   #10
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,898
Thanks: 6,349
Thanked 9,202 Times in 4,907 Posts

Default

Craig said he had the one surface 1905 plate. I have to review my TPS reference to this. Whatever the situation, I don't change them or try. In 1972, LDG Sr. did a 1910 plate conversion on my 28 gauge VH. There was not really a need for it, but I thought I wanted it. How was I to know that I would still be shooting this gun 52 years after I bought it? I have never bothered to convert one since.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.