Visit Brian Dudley's homepage! | |
12-08-2022, 10:38 PM | #3 | ||||||
|
Thank you. Appreciate the insight. I figured there was a mountain of discussion on this topic. Just was wondering if there were any published standards by Parker Bros. for barrels? And you’re correct, if it didn’t blow up or bulge somewhere I’m good. I wasn’t worried about the little Parker with the target loads, I was more concerned about the St. Etienne 16 that I was trying for the first time, shooting vintage Ted Williams shells we found on the back shelf at the range. All good.
|
||||||
12-09-2022, 07:02 AM | #4 | ||||||
|
The advice I generally see on here, coming from experienced shooters, collectors, and gunsmiths, is to have the barrel wall thickness of an old gun checked. Mirror bores could mean aggressively honed to remove pitting or frosting, but nevertheless dangerous.
Additionally, if an inner voice were speaking to me as yours was when you thought, “dang, they look pretty thin and dainty to me.", I would heed it and get a qualified person to measure the barrel walls for thickness, and as said above, search opinions on numerical safety limits on this Forum, and solicit them from qualified individuals elsewhere. I would not be confident about the barrels merely because they had not bulged or blown up during one shooting session.
__________________
"First off I scoured the Internet and this seems to be the place to be!” — Chad Whittenburg, 5-12-19 |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Russell E. Cleary For Your Post: |
12-09-2022, 09:38 AM | #5 | ||||||
|
First, you need a PGCA letter in an attempt to find out what the factory choke is, or was. A Skeet In or Cylinder would be a very thin muzzle from the factory. Any other choke would indicate choke work has been done, and you should measure the bore, choke, and wall thickness to be sure everything is OK.
|
||||||
12-09-2022, 11:57 AM | #6 | ||||||
|
If your bore is at .615 (give or take) you are fine. It’s been shot innumerable times since it left the factory and if the bores have not been honed out you are good to go. IMO
|
||||||
12-09-2022, 11:59 AM | #7 | ||||||
|
Many parkers made prior to the 1920s do not measure to nominal dimensions for a given gauge. They are usually oversized. And that is now they were made.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
12-09-2022, 01:03 PM | #8 | ||||||
|
Oversized bores in 1929?
|
||||||
12-09-2022, 01:54 PM | #9 | ||||||
|
I got a good answer from a member who pointed to me an article on this site that has what I want to follow up. I can't point at the link here because it was texted to me, but I believe it's located at the pages/faq/BarrelThickness posting from sometime back. In any event, it's great to hear and discuss this topic. As we all know, there are many variables involved here. For what it's worth, my 20 ga. shows no information available in the factory records. So I won't know from that. I will get the measurements now that I have a good idea of the standards based on the article mentioned above and then maintain the documentation for the next owner. Kind of like my old boats that I have a weakness for, we are only stewards of these treasures. I call my boats "floating furniture" - now I guess I'll call these fine old doubles "portable art." That's why we spend so much time and $$ on them. Thanks gents. Good discussion and insight. I think I have my answers.
|
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Loren Tillett For Your Post: |
12-09-2022, 02:50 PM | #10 | ||||||
|
nice words...shooting yesterday we had exactly that conversation about just being "stewards" of fine shotguns...and for me a particular boat. i'm sure both will still be in use long long after i'm gone.
|
||||||
|
|