Old Parker Hammer gun

Carl Baird · 01-14-2014, 11:08 PM

I'm just seeking general information.
I am an avid Parker collector, somewhat new and still a novice. I have a project hammer gun built in 1884. I wrote and received the official letter and have returned it to original specs. That required replacing the tiger maple stock with a good serviceable walnut stock that matched the walnut receiver. It's a field gun, no checkering, plain wood and stub twist barrels. It's beautiful.
I'm sure it will appreciate in value if I leave it as is, but I want to do more to it. I'd like to have it checkered with a simple pattern, I'd like to have the barrels reblued and maybe the receiver case colored.
If I did all that, it would look better, but what have I done to the value?

OH Osthaus · 01-14-2014, 11:16 PM

what grade is the gun according to the letter. Since you say "field grade" and twist barrels I assume a 0 grade.
,
Are the barrels solid and full length?

since it has been already been restocked, most of what you do will not give you much return on investment.

But you may have a great shooter to enjoy, and if you will enjoy it more refinished - that is your call

George Lander · 01-14-2014, 11:25 PM

Carl: You certainly would not want to blue the barrels as they were originally browned. I assume when you mention receiver you were referring to the forearm. You won't harm the value if you return it to it's original specifications, but you most probably won't increase the value by as much as you spend. Enjoy your Parker & WELCOME

Best Regards, George

Carl Baird · 01-14-2014, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick Losey

what grade is the gun according to the letter. Since you say "field grade" and twist barrels I assume a 0 grade.
,
Are the barrels solid and full length?

since it has been already been restocked, most of what you do will not give you much return on investment.

But you may have a great shooter to enjoy, and if you will enjoy it more refinished - that is your call

Yes, the grade is "O" and the barrels are solid and full length (32")
Thanks for the info.
Carl

Carl Baird · 01-14-2014, 11:52 PM

Yes you are correct..."to match the original walnut forend". I know about the browning process, and yes it would be to re-brown them.
Thanks very much for your comments.
Carl

Carl Baird · 01-14-2014, 11:54 PM

I think I will proceed since this is essentially for my enjoyment. The stub twist pattern is very bold, and although was considered the very basic twist barrel, it really appeals to me.
Carl

Bill Murphy · 01-15-2014, 07:45 AM

Do you have any pictures of the gun with the maple stock that you can post? It sounds like you have a nice gun.

Drew Hause · 01-15-2014, 08:25 AM

Carl: the barrels were finished in 'black & white' and turn 'plum' over time. Original colors may remain under the forend; courtesy of Carl Brandt

B. Dudley · 01-15-2014, 08:29 AM

If the twist pattern is currently visible and bold as you say, it should be left as is. Frame coloring is most likely not needed, but it is your call. Abou the only thing you mention that I am sure the gun could benefit from is checkering.
If it has no checkering, or very worn checkering, that is something it could likely benefit from.

Carl Baird · 01-15-2014, 11:37 AM

Thank you all for your thoughts. I have had lots of dialog concerning this gun. Originally, I bought it as a project and it was sold to me as an 11 ga. The .754 bore supported the possibility that it was an 11 ga., but the letter confirmed it was a 12 ga. Also, the 12 ga. cartridge fit perfectly. After lengthy reading and research and input from other members of PGCA 2 years ago, I concluded it was one of many Parkers that didn't fit the normal .729 configuration. The one thing I knew for sure was that the Tiger Maple Stock had to go. It was in stark contrast to the walnut forend, and even though it fit well, it drove me crazy. I am at peace with the new walnut stock and will proceed to get the original uncheckered forend and the new stock checkered. The picture Drew sent is very similar to my gun, but mine is even bolder. It may be because it is Stub Twist.
I think I will take your advise and not do anything to the metal.
I can send a picture of the stock, but it is not on the gun. Bill, if you want a picture of just the stock, I can do that? Again thanks for all your comments.
Carl