|
08-29-2012, 09:04 PM | #3 | ||||||
|
P
O T E N T I A L ? ? |
||||||
08-29-2012, 09:06 PM | #4 | ||||||
|
Not a bad idea, however something like that could be a slippery slope. ut I think there is enough knowledge here to be able to assign accurate numbers to guns if proper informaiton and photos are supplied.
Besides, it is people like us that are the ones buying these guns. However, I would not be surprised if insurance companies started getting copies of forum threads sent to them in place of formal appraisals. lol.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
08-29-2012, 09:15 PM | #5 | ||||||
|
I like it Pete!
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post: |
08-29-2012, 09:17 PM | #6 | ||||||
|
I like your idea. UNfortunatly there will be some feathers rubed the wrong way. You will have people that think there gun is worth way more than it was appraised for. I do think it would be of great value to most of the members of this forum but it may cause a few spats,and some people are pretty trickey with a camera.
|
||||||
08-29-2012, 09:25 PM | #7 | ||||||
|
Brian, could you expand on the slippery slope thought? The first pitfall I can think of is someone who believes there gun is worth more than it's appraisal here on the forums, or worse, they paid more than the appraisal range and they are insulted. However how is that different than the value of real estate?
I don't think every gun presented would necessarily be for sale or will be insured, I think there is a curiosity factor many. I think even a few of us might be curious what others think of various guns, maybe even a few of our own. I am sure we would end up looking at both very nice guns and not so nice guns, but Parkers are Parkers. People can go to the Blue Book and get ideas of value, why not here too, I think we could do a better job than the book.? Seems like it could be a nice service that might help a few people. |
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post: |
08-29-2012, 10:07 PM | #8 | ||||||
|
I think with a proper description of what the forum is and what it isn't, it could work. Start with a few words of warning as to what people can expect when they post their gun (in other words, expect an honest answer and be prepared not to agree with everyone) and it should be fine. As for the pictures, I wouldn't worry about people being "tricky", I'd worry about people knowing the front of the camera from the back. Good clear, bright pictures will be critical. Afterall, if they want to get tricky with the photos, they are only hurting themselves. I think to avoid a lot of unnecessary back and forth, there should be some minimum required shots of specific areas of the gun in order for everyone to make a good assessment.
Mike |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Mike.Smith For Your Post: |
08-29-2012, 10:37 PM | #9 | ||||||
|
If I was PGCA's lawyer, I would say that at a minimum it should be confined to members only.
|
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to George M. Purtill For Your Post: |
08-29-2012, 10:50 PM | #10 | ||||||
|
For lack of better term, Disclamers like, This does not assume safety of the firearm, can't measure/be sure of barrel thickness, can't tell if on/off face, can't measure choke, is it factory installed or repaired, all effecting value considerably. This is not an in hand appraisal for resale value only an educated opinion from pictures posted. Things like that.
I like the idea, I think it would be a popular thread. I know I would read it- although I think I read every thread on here now |
||||||
|
|