Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-31-2014, 06:34 AM   #61
Member
tom tutwiler
Forum Associate
 
tom tutwiler's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 707
Thanks: 443
Thanked 804 Times in 243 Posts

Default

Much smarter people then me will chime in here. That said the phrase "it depends" kicks in. If minimum barrel thickness of say .022 is located about 6-8" from the ends of the barrels that wouldn't both me much because the pressures have dropped way down by then anyway, and I'm assuming you would want to handload or shoot something like RST Lite loads where pressures are kept way down. That same .022 sure wouldn't work for me say 8" from the breech. I think halfway down the barrels you'd like to shoot for minimum of .032. Some factory small gauge Parkers were struck quite thin towards the ends of the barrel before the chokes started to kick in. PS. I had Fox early Pin Gun I purchased with some pretty significant outside pitting on the barrels. Had Dan Rossiter strike the barrels to remove the pitting and he had to take them down to .025 about 6" from the barrel ends before the rust blue. He recommended I only shoot RST ammo out of it but thought the barrels would be fine. When they get real thin they can be prone to dents from hitting just about anything (car doors, trees, etc. Ask me how I know )
tom tutwiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-31-2014, 07:42 AM   #62
Member
Mark Conrad
PGCA Invincible
Life Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 298
Thanks: 197
Thanked 638 Times in 123 Posts

Default

It looks like this gun may have been ordered with 2 7/8 inch chambers. There were a few 20's made on the 0 frame with the long chambers. The ones I have seen went to the west coast. The barrel weigh is also on the heavy side. While your measurement of the OD diameter less the inside diameter is a good sign, the barrels still need to be measured with a barrel wall thickness gauge. IMO, the ribs need to be removed for this restoration to be done correctly. I would say the odds of saving these barrels has gone up.
Mark Conrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-31-2014, 08:23 AM   #63
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,176
Thanks: 542
Thanked 20,101 Times in 5,059 Posts

Default

Minimum wall thickness up in the front is one thing. And your pitting towards the front of the barrels looks workable. And if you are really running high 30s for thickness up there then that should not be a problem in having material to work with there. The more important thing is how much material there is back by the breech. And that is where the pitting looks worse. I like to measure thickness at the forend loop and also in front of the chambers. I like to see thickness of .050 plus at the loop and usually wall thickness will be .090" to .100" at the chamber front on most barrels.

At this point it is all speculation since only a hands on analysis of the thickness in the pitted areas as well as depth of pitting will need to be done on your barrels to know for sure.
By the looks of it, they likely can be saved. But it will be a lot of careful draw filing.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 05-31-2014, 08:52 AM   #64
Member
C.O.B.
Forum Associate
 
Rich Anderson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,099
Thanks: 2,228
Thanked 6,400 Times in 2,099 Posts

Default

I would not try to turn down the outside of the barrels in an effort to reduce the pitting and rough spots. I would have the pits filled in by micro welding. Consult some of the craftsmen on this forum such as Brian Dudley, Brad Batchelder etc.
Rich Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rich Anderson For Your Post:
Unread 05-31-2014, 08:58 AM   #65
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,773
Thanks: 632
Thanked 2,594 Times in 931 Posts

Default

The verdict on these barrels cannot be rendered on this site. Although they seem savable, only a professional double gun barrel man can make that determination.

In my view, there are two good choices in that regard: Kirk Merrington or Brad Bachelder.

Since these tubes are fluid steel, some pits might be weldable. File work should be kept to an absolute minimum in any case.

Rather than elicit more speculation, I suggest you send the gun to a pro. Then heed his advice.
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to John Campbell For Your Post:
Unread 05-31-2014, 04:05 PM   #66
Member
StubTwist
Forum Associate
 
Frank Cronin's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 979
Thanks: 6,286
Thanked 1,611 Times in 484 Posts

Default

Not a Parker but this is my early LC Smith Syracuse extra heavy Quality 3 10 gauge with 32" barrels that had heavy pitting near the breach. The work was performed by Brad Balchelder who used laser to weld under magnification. Call him and I'm sure he will explain how he did it since I am not sure exactly how he did it. In any case, to do this on Damascus barrels is amazing. I'm sure he can help you with fluid steel barrels too.





Frank Cronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-01-2014, 09:38 AM   #67
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,704 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

Yes, Brad does this work on Damascus guns, as does Dale Edmonds ( through another gunsmith). I have previously posted pictures of welded splits in Damascus and twist barrels and filled pits. Some of the welded seams were quite old, indicating this repair technique has been going on for a long time. and holding since then.

Some people believe that only fluid steel barrels can be repaired by welding pits and implying that if Damascus the pits or even splits could not be welded. That is not the case from what I have seen.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-01-2014, 09:49 AM   #68
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,773
Thanks: 632
Thanked 2,594 Times in 931 Posts

Default

BD:
Mia culpa. Being a ferrous metal composite, of course Damascus can be welded. But with varying aesthetic success by amateurs. Bachelder does well. As do a few other specialists. And... if you were to read my previous post carefully, you will find that I did not say anything about Damascus barrels, nor the potential for their welding.
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-01-2014, 11:13 AM   #69
Member
Larry Huff
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 12
Thanks: 5
Thanked 11 Times in 5 Posts

Default

Brian,
You could always just stabilize/remove the rust, get a stock on it that fits you, and have it cleaned/checked out for safety by one of the good Parker smiths here , and have the coolest shooter grade gun in the woods . It would always have the story to tell and be preserved for a full correct restoration in the future if you wanted to .
Awesome gun and horrible it ended up this way .
Great find !
Larry Huff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.