What do you think of this one?

[edgarspencer]

No one can make an 0 frame barrel set into a 00, so that supports no argument for or against originality. We have all seen plenty of examples of stamping that might not rate perfect. There's no one here who can say the barrels are or are not original to the gun. I agree with Bill that there are lots of original guns with a less than perfect rib extension fit. Digital pictures on the internet rarely compare to 'eyeballs on'.
I just don't get the point in slamming a gun. Rivet counters are everywhere when they aren't buying.

[Researcher]

I know I'd be proud to walk onto a skeet field with 191767 provenance or not.

[mobirdhunter]

It’s a lovely little gun. I wish I had the money (and negotiating skills). I’d make that short stock work.

[edgarspencer]

Originally Posted by Garry L Gordon

It’s a lovely little gun. I wish I had the money (and negotiating skills). I’d make that short stock work.

A gun is too short only when your thumb hits your nose when fired. Go for it.

[Jay Oliver]

This one is a little out of my league, I’ll only add that when I talk myself into gun...meaning I don't like the chokes, it doesn't fit me, and I question a few things. I usually don't keep it long. I do like the engraving on the receiver...what's not to like...

[Dean Romig]

That’s all I like about that gun Jay.





.

[Bill Murphy]

Fussy, fussy.

[Dean Romig]

Originally Posted by Bill Murphy

Fussy, fussy.

.