![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
IMHO: take two guns of similar condition, grade, gauge, ect., and same price. Lay them side by side. One has well owned provenance, the other does not. The one with provenance will probably sell first. It may even command a slight premium. The problem is when folks discover that their gun was once owned by someone of past fame or fortune, (no matter who it was) they think they have found a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. Historically speaking perhaps they have, but in strict monetary terms not necessarily so. If you can connect it to someone like Annie Oakley, then all bets are off. But then anything connected with Miss Oakley renders collectors insane. Selling a gun with special provenance requires a very special and limited market. 98 + % of the people on this forum or in the general market place are not going to pay significantly more for a gun just because it belonged to the one time rich and famous. I, however, really, really, really like a gun with provenance. I think the gun in question was a fabulous find with a wonderful history and would encourage Mr. Corely to do lots of research. I promise that it will add untold personal value to the gun for him.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John Davis For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Could not agree more John. Provenance is what makes a gun stand out from the crowd, at least as far as I'm concerned. Just holding a gun that someone of note has owned and shot brings a special connection to a time long ago that I think we all would like to relive.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
My guns without provenance are for sale. The ones with good provenance, especially shooter provenance, not so much. Of course, my feeling about this puts me in the minority of Parker owners. So, John, how about the Fred Kimble B Grade hammer gun?
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Still searching.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#7 | |||||||
|
Quote:
I had asked about the gun's LOP earlier. A short gun might indicate the intended shooter in the family, given that there were no children in the household. A longer LOP might suggest the gun was intended for Mr. Astor. Maybe, maybe not but if you knew for a fact the gun was the personal firearm of either the wife versus Vincent Astor, then how would that effect the provenance value? A little? A lot? Depends on the buyer, right? That's not being a naysayer.
__________________
Will makes some excellent points and I agree with all of them. - Dean Romig 03-13-2013 Last edited by will evans; 02-08-2015 at 09:52 AM.. Reason: changed possessive of word guns to gun's |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
Me to. Every day
![]() ![]()
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Maybe not for the Fred Kimble gun but always something interesting.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
That same "chase" with the same guy put me on an 1892 Deluxe Takedown 44-40 yesterday
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|