Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-06-2014, 09:44 PM   #51
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Default

Bet you kind of wished you had kept that one. those were nice guns for brush hunting.
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-06-2014, 11:00 PM   #52
Member
Steve McCarty
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 306 Times in 211 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milton Starr View Post
Ive also pondered getting a 45/70 but it would have to be a sharps or something like that . With my 585 I plan on shooting a 650gr brass solid @ 2700 fps . should be plenty of oomph lol . I also wanted a 577 snider before but wasn't into the look of the rifle . you could always ream that #1 to 45-120 and load it smokeless !
Wow! That is one heck of a load! 585 bullet at 2700 fps? That's .458 numbers. More. I think. A .458 will push a bullet that heavy to about 2200, I think.

I own one of those Axtell 1877 Sharps rifles. Have yet to shoot it! It is a pretty thing. I called the company, before they went broke, and asked them if I could shoot smokeless in it. They reported that it was only proofed for BP. They also said that they are a lot stronger than is the original Sharps. Anyway, if I ever get around to shooting it, I'll load it to moderate smokeless levels. I like shooting BP tho. Might try 777.
Steve McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-06-2014, 11:17 PM   #53
Member
Steve McCarty
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 306 Times in 211 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wayne goerres View Post
40 grs of 3031 is a pretty light load in a 45/70. You wont gain much by rechambering to 45/120 with smokeless powder. My 400/450 uses 60grs of 3031 with a 400gr jacked bullet. Mine is a double so it probable weighs a little more than a Ruger no 1.
I cannot recall what the load was I used in my 45/70 for the Ruger No 1. I do recall using 3031. I usually load the middle load as recorded in a reloading manual.

I have a friend who hunts with Lord Randolph Churchill's 400/450! I've seen the rifle, beautiful. Cased. As I write I cannot recall the maker. The owner had about a eight or ten wonderful double rifles.
Steve McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-07-2014, 12:09 AM   #54
Member
Eldon Goddard
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 846
Thanks: 312
Thanked 390 Times in 170 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McCarty View Post
I have a friend who hunts with Lord Randolph Churchill's 400/450! I've seen the rifle, beautiful. Cased. As I write I cannot recall the maker. The owner had about a eight or ten wonderful double rifles.
That would be something to see.
My .458 lott will push a 500 grain bullet 2300 and the .460 weatherby will go about 2600. I heard the early factory ammo for the .460 weatherby went as fast as 2700 but they turned it down.
Eldon Goddard is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-07-2014, 10:14 AM   #55
Member
C.O.B.
Forum Associate
 
Rich Anderson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,079
Thanks: 2,220
Thanked 6,330 Times in 2,084 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wayne goerres View Post
Bet you kind of wished you had kept that one. those were nice guns for brush hunting.
There have been times I wish I had it but the Taylor is a real nice rifle and will do much more than the 45/70 is capable of.
Rich Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-07-2014, 11:31 AM   #56
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Default

You can shoot smokeless loads in that sharps but you should stick with nitro for black loads. 5744 is a pretty good powder to work with. Load to trap door pressures. Can you post some pics of your sharps.
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-07-2014, 06:23 PM   #57
Member
Steve McCarty
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 306 Times in 211 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eldon Goddard View Post
That would be something to see.
My .458 lott will push a 500 grain bullet 2300 and the .460 weatherby will go about 2600. I heard the early factory ammo for the .460 weatherby went as fast as 2700 but they turned it down.
I have fired a Whby 460 once, and from the bench. I embarrassed myself when the end of the bolt came back and hit me square on the nose, which filled my eyes with tears. I couldn't help it. When I shoot really big bore rifles I stand up and allow by torso to take the recoil.

I enjoy shooting H&H 375's and don't find them punishing. Of course when you actually shoot at hair you don't notice the recoil at all.

I doubt I'll ever go back to Africa. Around here elk are thick, I mean in my neighborhood! They are a pest. Deer too. I have never even shot at an elk tho. During elk season the woods sound like an infantry attack. Most guys, however; go after them with a bow in the earlier season and the success rate is high.
Steve McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-07-2014, 07:34 PM   #58
Member
Steve McCarty
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 306 Times in 211 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wayne goerres View Post
You can shoot smokeless loads in that sharps but you should stick with nitro for black loads. 5744 is a pretty good powder to work with. Load to trap door pressures. Can you post some pics of your sharps.
Here is the Axtell:





Critics complain that the Axtell's aren't up to Shiloh Sharps quality. Mine looks okay to me. I can see some slight flaws in the inletting, but not much.
Steve McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-07-2014, 07:37 PM   #59
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,954
Thanks: 6,387
Thanked 9,268 Times in 4,941 Posts

Default

That is not an ugly gun. Can we see a few more pictures?
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-07-2014, 08:13 PM   #60
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Default

Dam fine English sharps (1877). Looks pretty good to me.
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.