Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-04-2025, 02:52 PM   #41
Member
Andy
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,207
Thanks: 286
Thanked 3,082 Times in 1,220 Posts

Default

Like all membership organizations, and it doesn't matter if it's the AAA or AMA or your bowling league, membership is grown ONE person at a time through a relationship. I notice a lot of forum associates post just to get a price. One idea is to have someone act as a "liaison" to non members and offer to speak to them on the phone about any questions. Another is to form our own database of SOLD PRICES such as Excellence Magazine does for Porsches'. The only ones who can access that database are members. I'm not sure that would be difficult to do.
__________________
Nothing ruins your Friday like finding out it's only Tuesday
Andrew Sacco is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Andrew Sacco For Your Post:
Unread 08-04-2025, 03:12 PM   #42
Member
Dylan Rhodes
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 235
Thanks: 184
Thanked 255 Times in 104 Posts

Default

Being a young bloke in this collecting world - if anyone is wanting to get rid of their Parker 12 gauges I offer a low cost service for disposal, just send them to me.


But its a lot of what people have already said I think. The 12 gauge is the most common gauge and few my age want a double barrel, and even fewer want a SXS, and even fewer still want a vintage one.

The anti-thesis to this - I personally enjoy the 12 gauge guns and the few collectors my age I know do as well, purely because we can afford them. Saving up for a 16 or even a 20 is a financial undertaking even in the lowest grades. Mind you the economy is what it is, then you have a family to support, then your other hobbies, trying to buy a first home, etc. At least we can get in the game with 12's
Dylan Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dylan Rhodes For Your Post:
Unread 08-04-2025, 06:41 PM   #43
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,083
Thanks: 1,884
Thanked 5,487 Times in 1,531 Posts

Default

If you think the price of a vintage Parker 12ga is low now it will be a lot lower if and when the US follows the UK and enacts a complete ban on the use of lead shot.

Sometimes I think having a collection of vintage doubles is like playing a game of musical chairs, there may not be seat when the music stops if you own too many.
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Unread 08-04-2025, 07:11 PM   #44
Member
MrBojangles
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 243
Thanks: 75
Thanked 232 Times in 78 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Lester View Post
If you think the price of a vintage Parker 12ga is low now it will be a lot lower if and when the US follows the UK and enacts a complete ban on the use of lead shot.

Sometimes I think having a collection of vintage doubles is like playing a game of musical chairs, there may not be seat when the music stops if you own too many.
Is that being proposed?
Ian Civco is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2025, 07:13 PM   #45
Member
Dylan Rhodes
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 235
Thanks: 184
Thanked 255 Times in 104 Posts

Default

In my humble opinion if you have the disposable income for this hobby a ban on lead shot would just fuel the fire by allowing you to afford higher grades for less money. Considering I collect for the nostalgia and solely hunting and not to diversify my investment portfolio, 5-10 boxes of bismuth or similar a year won’t dissuade me.

It probably will effectively negate anyone new from entering the game, unless they grow up into it, but I don’t think it’s going to cause a mass exit of the hobby.

Of course, if you’re shooting a round of 100 every weekend your opinion will be different.

In any event, it’s speculation at this point, and out of my control. What is in my control is enjoying these guns and choosing to accept the risk that may or may not come, considering there is an existing solution.
Dylan Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dylan Rhodes For Your Post:
Unread 08-04-2025, 07:27 PM   #46
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,083
Thanks: 1,884
Thanked 5,487 Times in 1,531 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Civco View Post
Is that being proposed?
It became the law of the land in California on July 1st. It was banned for waterfowling 35+ years ago and it has been banned on some federal and state lands as well.

I would say it's coming eventually, just a question of when.
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Unread 08-04-2025, 07:30 PM   #47
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,083
Thanks: 1,884
Thanked 5,487 Times in 1,531 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan Rhodes View Post
In my humble opinion if you have the disposable income for this hobby a ban on lead shot would just fuel the fire by allowing you to afford higher grades for less money. Considering I collect for the nostalgia and solely hunting and not to diversify my investment portfolio, 5-10 boxes of bismuth or similar a year won’t dissuade me.

It probably will effectively negate anyone new from entering the game, unless they grow up into it, but I don’t think it’s going to cause a mass exit of the hobby.

Of course, if you’re shooting a round of 100 every weekend your opinion will be different.

In any event, it’s speculation at this point, and out of my control. What is in my control is enjoying these guns and choosing to accept the risk that may or may not come, considering there is an existing solution.
Over the course of a year I shoot thousands of lead shells at clay pigeons and crows. Bismuth is not an affordable alternative/existing solution and steel remains the most economical non tox shot which is not friendly to vintage guns.

Seriously who is going to pay $50 or more for the shells to shoot a 25 target round of trap, skeet or five stand? Because two dollars a shell is about the cost of reloading bismuth at today's prices.
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2025, 07:35 PM   #48
Member
Double Lab
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Daryl Corona's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,001
Thanks: 18,314
Thanked 7,832 Times in 2,980 Posts

Default

I'll say it again. Have waterfowl populations done better or worse since they mandated non toxic waterfowl loads?
__________________
Wag more- Bark less.
Daryl Corona is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post:
Unread 08-04-2025, 07:37 PM   #49
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,083
Thanks: 1,884
Thanked 5,487 Times in 1,531 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daryl Corona View Post
I'll say it again. Have waterfowl populations done better or worse since they mandated non toxic waterfowl loads?
That argument won't change the trajectory of saving the planet.
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Unread 08-04-2025, 07:42 PM   #50
Member
Dylan Rhodes
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 235
Thanks: 184
Thanked 255 Times in 104 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Lester View Post
Over the course of a year I shoot thousands of lead shells at clay pigeons and crows. Bismuth is not an affordable alternative/existing solution and steel remains the most economical non tox shot which is not friendly to vintage guns.

Seriously who is going to pay $50 or more for the shells to shoot a 25 target round of trap, skeet or five stand? Because two dollars a shell is about the cost of reloading bismuth at today's prices.
You may have overlooked my statement regarding what you do with the guns and how you get enjoyment from them. I can swallow the 2 dollar a shot pill for my purposes, and if no one else can for theirs, well I guess that just works out for me then.
Dylan Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.