Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-05-2014, 05:33 PM   #41
Member
ed good
On Vacation

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 787
Thanks: 205
Thanked 203 Times in 124 Posts

Default

is it true that runge was darth vader's other son?

thank you to all who submitted positive, on topic posts here. I learned a lot, specially the part about bob runge working for both Parker and Remington. it is the best explanation I have heard as to who the artist might have been, who engraved the atypical G grade gun pictured at the beginning of this thread.
ed good is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-05-2014, 05:52 PM   #42
Member
ed good
On Vacation

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 787
Thanks: 205
Thanked 203 Times in 124 Posts

Default

and here is some speculation:

runge was the new guy at parker, having started work in 1934. the g grade with the v grade barrels was made in November , 1935... wonder why the new guy got to engrave the gun assembled with the wrong barrels?
ed good is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-05-2014, 05:58 PM   #43
Member
Harry Reed
Forum Associate
 
Harryreed's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 158
Thanks: 258
Thanked 97 Times in 40 Posts

Default

Probably, as a good employee he worked on whatever the company put before him. I am still not convinced the barrels were the wrong barrels. Could be any number of reasons why that Parker was configured that way. IMHO.
Harryreed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Harryreed For Your Post:
Unread 01-05-2014, 06:22 PM   #44
Member
AmarilloMike
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Shepherd's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1,158
Thanked 403 Times in 147 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ed good View Post
gentlemen: it would be nice if we could keep this thread to the subject of its original intent, which is to determine the differences in G Grade engravings over the years.

If you wish to discuss specific guns, and their barrel configurations, etc, then please do so, but not in this thread. thank you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ed good View Post
and here is some speculation:

runge was the new guy at parker, having started work in 1934. the g grade with the v grade barrels was made in November , 1935... wonder why the new guy got to engrave the gun assembled with the wrong barrels?
I thought you instructed us that we weren't supposed to talk about barrels on this thread - just G engraving patterns?

If I have your permission to talk about barrels now I think the gun shipped from the factory with those barrels.
Mike Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mike Shepherd For Your Post:
Unread 01-05-2014, 06:23 PM   #45
Member
ed good
On Vacation

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 787
Thanks: 205
Thanked 203 Times in 124 Posts

Default

harry: from what I have read, when Remington took over the Parker shops their primary goals were to ship product and to use up materials so they would not have to move parts to New York...therefore, Remington management were not as strict as the Parker Bros. managers, and did make some deviations from the normal rigid Parker production standards. maybe the vh barrels on the gh gun was a mistake? maybe it was intentional? factory research letter does confirm gun was made in November, 1935, which supports the R D date code and vh in a circle stamps on the barrel flats.

for more details regarding the Remington era, see "the parker story" and muderlak's fine books "old reliable" and "shoot flying".

Last edited by ed good; 01-05-2014 at 06:47 PM..
ed good is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-05-2014, 06:25 PM   #46
Member
ed good
On Vacation

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 787
Thanks: 205
Thanked 203 Times in 124 Posts

Default

ok, lets talk barrels.

anybody seen any other parker guns with the "wrong" barrels that could be factory?

pitchers would be great!

better yet, I will start a new thread!
ed good is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-05-2014, 06:26 PM   #47
Member
AmarilloMike
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Shepherd's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1,158
Thanked 403 Times in 147 Posts

Default

How come you can go off topic but we can't?
Mike Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-05-2014, 06:35 PM   #48
Member
AmarilloMike
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Shepherd's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1,158
Thanked 403 Times in 147 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ed good View Post
harry: from what I have read, when Remington took over the Parker shops their primary goals were to ship product and to use up materials so they would not have to move parts to New York...therefore, Remington management were not as strict as the Parker Bros. managers, and did make some deviations from the normal rigid Parker production standards. maybe the vh barrels on the gh gun was a mistake? maybe it was intentional? factory research letter does confirm gun was made in November, 1934, which supports the R D date code and vh in a circle stamps on the barrel flats.

for more details regarding the Remington era, see "the parker story" and muderlak's fine books "old reliable" and "shoot flying".
ed you are the master of baiting, trolling, and leg humping. Many times I have shaken my head in disbelief at your posts.
Mike Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mike Shepherd For Your Post:
Unread 01-05-2014, 06:44 PM   #49
Member
ed good
On Vacation

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 787
Thanks: 205
Thanked 203 Times in 124 Posts

Default

anyone wishing to discuss parkers with atypical factory barrels, please see new thread:

Parkers with "wrong" barrels
ed good is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-05-2014, 06:52 PM   #50
Member
Kevin McCormack
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,331
Thanks: 1,911
Thanked 4,591 Times in 1,263 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=ed good;125319]is it true that runge was darth vader's other son?

Not exactly - the Bob Runge pertinent to this thread is Robert Phoenix Runge, son of Parker Bros. master engraver Robert Rudolph Runge, who joined Parker Bros. in Meriden in 1911. A master of deep-tendril cutaway scroll, the fabulous A's, AA's, and A-1 Specials of the post-WW I era all show his hand as well as those of Fred Aschutz, William Leidtke and other Parker Bros. masters.

Having been employed as an apprentice engraver to his father on July 17, 1934, approximately one month after Parker was purchased by Remington, it is highly unlikely that "our" Bob engraved anything but screw heads and diamond-dot barrel band borders by the time the GHE/VHE gun featured in this thread was made c. 1935.

On the other hand, odd-out, one-off style of the birds engraved on this gun, along with the overly-wide circular border around the floorplate scene suggests that it could indeed have been the product of a fledgling apprentice - Robert Phoenix Runge's first engraved gun?

So far as the "VH-GH" conundrum goes - clearly a re-barreled gun for whatever the reason.
Kevin McCormack is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Kevin McCormack For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.