![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Anthony:
It's a "scotch brite" pad... the kitchen sink type is just a tad too rough... which is why I recco a worn one. But you might find "softer" versions locally. Bachelder is in Grand Rapids MI... just put the name into the google box for his site. Best, Kensal I stand corrected on the rib matting... most shops would have rolled it on. But not Parker! |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Though the rib matting MAY have been a factory botch, it would be a good idea to at least look into getting it fixed. The cost may be reasonable and worth the expense. It may be money well spent considering that some perspective purchasers might be chased away from paying top dollar for such a defect.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Anthony:
While I hesitate adding to this already over-long thread, I highly recommend that you not use 3-inch 20-bore cartridges in the gun once it's restored. Even high-velocity 2 3/4" cartridges are not a good choice. Why? Because you gain very little in performance and put a colossal strain on the gun's stock - not to mention your shoulder. Virtually every American walnut stocked Parker I've ever taken to bits has a cracked stock head. Mostly from aged wood combined with the use of overloaded ammunition. But it's your gun. You are certainly free to do what you like. Best, Kensal |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Dean - did not miss it - only pointing out that not all Parkers left the factory perfect regardless of the process - thanks!
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
Frank - thank you for the VH story! I love it. And your Parker is beautiful. Who did the work? I am leaning toward having the entire gun restored.
Kensal - I'll probably never use 3" shells. The gun will be more for sporting clays. B. Dudley - undecided about the "botched" rib. The VH has a certain history (either way) Tony |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Anthony Cibelli For Your Post: |
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
[QUOTE=undecided about the "botched" rib. The VH has a certain history (either way)
Tony[/QUOTE] Tony, well one thing is for sure, if those areas are not low, then they are original. We may never know what caused it, and it is good for conversation. If you decide to leave as is, it is for good reason. Just another unanswered question. If you decide to have the gun restored, let us know how it comes out. We would all love to see it.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Tony, the 20 gauge barrel & forend fitting was done by Dewey Vicknair, well known to most of the Parker brethren.
Just a few words on shooting 20 gauge/3-inch BCC factory shells in this gun ...... remembering our physics classes, the recoil transferred to the head of the stock is based on only three parameters: mass of the ejecta (shot, wads and powder gasses), velocity of the ejecta, and mass of the gun. Pressure of the load is not a consideration. Now let's figure...... The 20 gauge BCC ejecta is lighter than many 12 gauge loads the VH was designed for. And let's assume the 20 gauge velocity is about the same as the 12 gauge with comparable hunting loads. And we'll keep in mind the gun is significantly heavier with the 20 gauge/3-inch barrel mounted, than is is with the factory 12 gauge barrel. Ergo, less recoil is transferred to the head of the stock when shooting the 3-inch BCC 1-1/16 oz loads than when shooting something like 1-1/8 ounce 12 gauge hunting loads. Way less than when shooting 1-1/4 ounce 12 gauge hunting loads. This VH has been out on the sporting course many times. Those 32-inch 20 gauge barrels point like a magic wand ![]() Plenty of mass in either set of barrels
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post: |
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
that is one incredable 20 ga. very nice. thanks for sharing with us.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to John Truitt For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|