![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | ||||||
|
![]()
I enjoy collecting and shooting both, but I own 14 Parkers and two Smith's. I guess you would call me a confirmed Parker guy. Why, because I prefer the looks of a Parker and they were made in wider variety of gauges, barrel lengths and action types.
I have also made room in my gun collection for a bunch of Foxes and two Lefevers. From my experience Parkers and Foxes are the most robust, Smiths and Lefevers are not as robust. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Craig Larter For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | ||||||
|
![]()
Craig, I have a similar array of the American "big four". My question is why a Lefever or a double trigger Smith is not robust. I will admit that a single trigger Smith is a bit of a challenge.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | ||||||
|
![]()
My Lefever is a plain jane I grade, but she is a real beauty. She is also light and quick. A really fine little shotgun, two trigger, damascus, all original. The safety is stiff. I've been to several gunsmiths with it and none of them will touch it. Liability they say.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | ||||||
|
![]()
Liability??? What a bunch of pansy bedwetters...
You need a real gunsmith, not some Gen Z weenie. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lloyd McKissick For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | ||||||
|
![]()
I have never missed a target over double triggers, but I did miss a target with a single trigger when I slipped my finger behind the single trigger and tried to pull the back of the trigger guard
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to todd allen For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | ||||||
|
![]()
Yeah, I thought the same thing. I've been futzing with the little Lefever today and I can get along with the stiff safety okay. It is a beautiful but plain shotgun. 12. Keith Kerschur did some work on it. I like G grade Lefevers, but do not own one.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Steve McCarty For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | ||||||
|
![]()
My very first Damascus gun was a G-grade Lefever ( back in the early 90s) and the nicest American double I've ever handled was a C-grade Lefever in 16 with B-grade engraving.
They can be exceptionally nice guns. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lloyd McKissick For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | ||||||
|
![]()
I agree that my GH Parker is a better gun than my O grade L.C. Smith. And thank you for all of the imput I had from my post asking that question.
I bought my GH Parker from the Nosler gun store in Bend Oregon in 2011. At the time I was led to believe that the gun was a garden variety Parker. Now, and after a decade of reading about it I have deduced that it is a much better than that. My question is, is my GH a midgrade Parker? |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|