|
03-09-2018, 06:41 PM | #33 | |||||||
|
Quote:
Well there it is in black & white... Todd doesn't think Remington cares. Apparantly Remington is too busy to care??? Have at it guys - print whatever you want to...(at your own peril, I should add.) .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
|||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
03-09-2018, 07:53 PM | #34 | |||||||
|
Quote:
And for calling me out Dean, I'm notifying the mattress police on your ass and for your sake hope you did not remove the tags. Last edited by Todd Poer; 03-09-2018 at 08:05 PM.. |
|||||||
03-09-2018, 09:13 PM | #35 | |||||||
|
Quote:
These days I throw caution to the wind and snip off all such warnings. So, you see - you can't scare me with idle threats.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
|||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
03-09-2018, 09:30 PM | #36 | ||||||
|
Dang, and I thought for sure I at least had you crawling underneath your bed looking for tags.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Todd Poer For Your Post: |
03-10-2018, 08:38 AM | #37 | ||||||
|
It really has nothing to do with right wrong or Remington.
Company bankrup the sharks come out looking for blood. All it takes is one attorney seeing PGCA using Remington trademarks and having cash in our bank account. He takes us to court and settles out of court, gets a cut of the settlement. The Bankruptcy Court can’t play favorites, have to protect creditors and accepts the agreement. I was called to testify in a similar case years ago. Attoney representing creditors brought a frivolous lawsuit against a former vendor to the bankrupt company. Case was thrown out it was so ridiculous, vendor had to pay his own legal bills. No recourse. It’s not worth it. William |
||||||
03-10-2018, 09:05 AM | #38 | |||||||
|
Quote:
BUT i find it sad that in this world any more, most of the time, it has nothing to do with right or wrong
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE |
|||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post: |
03-10-2018, 09:40 AM | #39 | ||||||
|
Rick international shipping for years was involved in a number lawsuits. Every legal system is different and we always took the advice of our attorneys. Most of the time in the US the advice was settle because of the cost. Primary difference in the American system vs other countries is no compensation for you expenses when sued even if the case is thrown out.
Key issue in bankruptcy is it’s not Remington that would want compensation for unauthorized use of trademark. It’s the creditors that are looking for money as a group. And the court is likely to agree to hear anyone bringing a legitimate claim. Money recovered goes into the pool paying all creditors. I don’t look on it in a negative way, the creditors deserve to be paid. Only issue I have is frivolous. More often than not the result of overloaded courts accepting most claims & letting the attorneys work it out. William |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to William Davis For Your Post: |
03-10-2018, 09:43 AM | #40 | |||||||
|
Quote:
I know Muderlack et al. are like gospel around here. However, I must point out that at least as of 2004, it is Remington’s position that they have rights in the PARKER BROS. mark (as well as the PARKER mark, which they have registered). In 2004, Remington successfully sued a newly-formed entity called Parker Bros. Markers, Inc., for trademark infringement based on unauthorized use of the PARKER BROS. and PARKER BROS. MAKERS marks. I am posting the entire complaint, as filed by Remington, as I think some of our members (with robust teeth) may be interested in the historical details contained therein. Paragraphs 11 and 12 are particularly relevant to the topic at hand. The PGCA gets a shout-out in Paragraph 9. -Victor |
|||||||
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Victor Wasylyna For Your Post: |
|
|