![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Francis: My favorite quotation from the man my dad called "Jimmy", James F. Byrnes, is:
"Too many people these days are concerned with SECURITY instead of OPPORTUNITY. It seems folks are woried more about LIVING than the are of DYING". I don't know what the gun was that he hunted with, but I know that he Bird Hunted (bob white quail) with Havilah Babcock and ducks & marsh hens with Bernard Baruch. If I had to guess I would say that it was either a Parker or a Fox. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to George Lander For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
The Parker automatic ejector is a needlessly complicated system with way too many parts that need to be in precise adjustment to funcion properly. (No wonder it added over 25% to the price of a new gun!). If you want to see a really ingenious and simple, also utterly reliable auto ejector design, examine the drawings of the Holland & Holland and Boss ejector systems. The H&H system is rediculously simple with very few moving parts, and the Boss system is a masterpiece of gun engineering, inclluding a mid-position detent that elevates unfired cartridges way out of the gun for easy removal if desired. The H&H system is to the Parker system what Elmer Miller's single trigger design is to the first generation Parker single trigger design. Owning and trying to shoot a Parker with a bad ejector train (or a malfunctioning single trigger) is like owning and trying to drive a bad-running vintage Jaguar - the worst is yet to come.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
I like the analogy.My buddy just inherited a 54 Jag.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
I owned a 54 jag XK120M Fixed Head Coupe back in the 50's and the need for a good Jag mechanic was always in my mind. However there were good Jag mechanics and they kept mine running very well. There are good Parker mechanics who can keep an ejector running well, in spite of Kevin's skepticism. David
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
A hunting friend built a 1954 XK120 for his son who was approaching driving age several years ago. He had obtained it from an old gal who had installed real leopard skin seat covers and a few other sacrilegious modifications. My friend tossed the Jag engine and installed a hot 289 Ford engine and transmission. I have no idea where that car is today, but I bet it is still running.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
Austin: I see your point. There are two types of two barrel sets. Those originally ordered with the second barrel and those sent back to Parker for an additional set. Both types are mentioned in Mark Conrad's letters. I have a couple of each kind.
I had an XJ12 and always thought I need another one. One to drive while the other was in the shop. Bill, a friend of mine did the same with his XK 120 but with an engine out of a wrecked corvette (his uncle owned the junkyard) That one was a real bomb. Nothing around here could come close to touching it. Best Regards, George Last edited by George Lander; 08-21-2010 at 12:59 PM.. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
They were cars with there own strengths and faults. One large fault shared with many other sports cars of the era was that they were front end heavy. A lighter weight engine would be a boon. David
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
Actually George there is alway's the third option...Barrels added by a gunsmith along the way. Not really a two barrel set just a gun with an extra set of barrels.
A Jag with a Corvette motor...that sounds like fun...here we go again..
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|