Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-02-2014, 10:02 AM   #1
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,000
Thanks: 1,280
Thanked 5,413 Times in 1,520 Posts

Default

Right now, I'm leaning towards that number/fraction being the width across the breach. This should also be the width across the bolsters. Every so often there is extra info to the right of the number/fraction and I can make out the abbreviation for barrels (Bbl).

Brian, in the example of a stock book page in TPS, that's from 1923 and the page I scanned is from 1880 so they may have changed as to what was put in each column. I do agree that what you see is dram equivalent. But notice that 12ga's were at 3dr and 16ga's were 2 1/2. Parker recommended 3dr for 12ga's and 2 3/4 to 3 dr for 16ga's.

In looking at a lot of stock book pages, the most common number/fraction found is 2 3/8 which would be a 2 frame. 2 frames were the most common for 12ga back then and also used sometimes for the 10ga. 2 1/4 would be a 1 frame, 2 3/8 would be a 2 frame (most commonly found in my scan), 2 12 for a 3 frame, and 2 5/8 for a size 4 frame.

S/N's 16985 to 18282 in stock book #6 are the only examples found with these numbers/fractions. I'll have Larry Frey measure across the bolsters on his hammer gun and see if correlates to what is found in the stock book. If anyone has a hammer gun in those S/N ranges, measure the width across the bolsters and let me know.

One other thing, did they make shells back in those days that correlate to those numbers/fractions? Did they make 2 1/2, 2 3/4, 2 1/4 2 5/8 dram shells???
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 02-02-2014, 08:55 AM   #2
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,207
Thanks: 39,335
Thanked 36,396 Times in 13,319 Posts

Default

xxx edited out
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-02-2014, 09:11 AM   #3
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,111
Thanks: 538
Thanked 19,901 Times in 5,012 Posts

Default

WAIT A MIN... !!!!

I noticed something else when looking at the photo I have of the 1913 stock book from Remington.

Later stock books used a column just after the grade to record frame size. The first ones were hand written and the even later ones used rubber stamps for the frame size. The 1913 example does not have a column next to grade for frame size. However... they list frame size in the final column under the "Remarks" column along with the shot size and drams of powder, but above that info in the row.

See in this cropped down photo of that page, that the top row actual says "Frame", and then the other rows following just list the number. In the first many examples they are 0 frame guns in 20g. as shown by the bore size a few columns before.
But... Look about 3/4 of the way down when it gets to three rows for 12 bore guns. It lists 2-3/8 as the frame size???

Frame size 2.jpg

What is up with that method of recording the frame size? In this 1913 example 2-3/8, no doubt means 2 frame. But why the 3/8?
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is online now   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 02-02-2014, 09:17 AM   #4
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,915
Thanks: 4,391
Thanked 4,112 Times in 1,744 Posts

Default

Very interesting stuff here. So can someone define the frame sizes as they correlate to our commonly used 0,1,1 1/2,2 etc.?
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-02-2014, 09:28 AM   #5
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,722
Thanks: 6,895
Thanked 10,111 Times in 5,352 Posts

Default

Dave, Dean and Bill clarified that in earlier posts. Charts on page 45 in the Serialization Book and page 527 in The Parker Story correlates the inches width of bolsters to frame size. The 2 1/2 at the factory was a #3 frame stamped on the gun, and so on. Brian, it makes sense if we realize that the later books use the sizes actually stamped on the gun and the earlier books identify frames in inches and fractions of inches.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-02-2014, 09:26 AM   #6
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,111
Thanks: 538
Thanked 19,901 Times in 5,012 Posts

Default

Hard to tell from the example I showed since only 20 and only a few 12g guns are listed.

I just checked my photos of the other page from that same book and it is the same deal. All 20g guns with only two 12g labeled the same way. As 2-3/8 frame size.
They were making a lot of 0 frame 20s that week.

In the days of hand written frame sizes in actual frame size columns (around 1928), I was able to confirm in the research for my article on the Hayes Prototype Trojan that sizes written as 1/2 were actually 1-1/2. But this earlier frame size oddity does not make much sense at all.

Chuck,
Are you able to maybe take a tally of what you see by way of those fractional number markings and how they correlate to the bore size. However, we are talking about 1881 as compared to 1913. So no doubt there may have been some differences.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is online now   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 02-02-2014, 09:28 AM   #7
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,207
Thanks: 39,335
Thanked 36,396 Times in 13,319 Posts

Default

Once again..... look at the chart in the ID & Ser. book on page 45 re: Column F 'width across the bolsters' for frame size 2 is 2 3/" as I spoke of in my earlier post.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-02-2014, 09:31 AM   #8
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,111
Thanks: 538
Thanked 19,901 Times in 5,012 Posts

Default

Ok. I see now. So now chuck can add frame size to letters.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is online now   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 02-02-2014, 10:09 AM   #9
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,000
Thanks: 1,280
Thanked 5,413 Times in 1,520 Posts

Default

Brian, here is the problem with adding that info in letters. They are only found in the S/N range of 16985 to 18282 in stock book #6. For some reason, whoever copied that book, starting at 16985 they loaded the stock book biased to the left which gave those numbers. Usually, the right end got chopped off after the total weight. By biasing the book to the left, they excluded the first column which gives the barrel steel and grade, example Dam3. Now if I am doing a research letter and only have the stock book in that S/N range, I can't tell what the grade or barrel steel that particular gun had. Therefore, I can't do a letter on that gun.

Hopefully some day, we'll get those stock books and try and recopy them.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 02-02-2014, 01:44 PM   #10
Member
Double Play
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Larry Frey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,308
Thanks: 946
Thanked 2,796 Times in 642 Posts

Default

Below is a letter I recently received from Chuck with a note asking me to measure the chamber length to see if it matched the 2 3/8 he found while doing the letter. It did not, but after reading this thread and Dean's thoughts on frame size I checked the gun and sure enough the gun is a two frame with 1 1/8" between the firing pins and 2 3/8" across the breech face. If I was a betting man my bet is Dean got it right.

Hello Mr. Frey,

Parker shotgun, serial number 18127, was ordered by H.T. Hudson of Portland OR in December of 1881 and shipped on December 7, 1881. The order was placed by Dexter W. Parker. According to Parker Bros. Order Book No. 10, it was a Quality D, Lifter Action Hammer Gun, 12-gauge. It featured Damascus steel barrels with a length of 30 inches.

The price was $125.00.

According to Parker Bros. Stock Book No. 6, the stock configuration was a pistol grip and its specifications were: Length of Pull: 14 ¼”, Drop at Heel: 2 5/8”, Weight: 8 pounds. The chokes were patterned RH 140 and LH 140 pellets of size 8 shot in a 24” circle at 45 yards.

Last edited by Larry Frey; 02-02-2014 at 02:38 PM.. Reason: correction
Larry Frey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Larry Frey For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.