Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Damascus Barrels & Steel

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-24-2022, 10:51 PM   #31
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,070
Thanks: 36,775
Thanked 34,207 Times in 12,646 Posts

Default

First thing I read too Daryl. And as Daryl says, Keep up the great job John!!





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 12-26-2022, 06:53 PM   #32
Member
Kingston Wulff
PGCA Member
 
Kingston Wulff's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 48
Thanks: 169
Thanked 42 Times in 15 Posts

Default

There is plenty of evidence that smokeless powders should not be used in Damascus barreled guns. Why, then, do many Parker gun owners use RST smokeless loads in their vintage Parkers when they were intended to be shot only with black powder? It does not matter if the gun was built with Damascus or Vulkan steel. If the gun was designed for BP, I say, shoot BP. The results are actually quite good.
__________________
Kingston Wulff
(Nantan Lukan) Apache: wolf warrior

Well done is better than well said.
Ben Franklin
Kingston Wulff is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-26-2022, 08:24 PM   #33
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,070
Thanks: 36,775
Thanked 34,207 Times in 12,646 Posts

Default

The problem early-on when smokeless first came into use was that folks were loading their shells with smokeless powder to black powder specs or recipes. In those days black powder was measured in drams and to use smokeless powder it must be measured in a 'dram equivalent' which was/is a measurement determined by the combustion and resultant pressures generated by each. If smokeless powder was measured simply in drams you would have pressures far too great for the durability of the guns of the day.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 12-26-2022, 08:40 PM   #34
Member
Kingston Wulff
PGCA Member
 
Kingston Wulff's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 48
Thanks: 169
Thanked 42 Times in 15 Posts

Default

I understand that. The question still remains, why would you load an RST reduced load shell into a vintage shotgun that was proofed for BP with a reduced load RST? The RST is still 3X the chamber pressure as a BP load.
__________________
Kingston Wulff
(Nantan Lukan) Apache: wolf warrior

Well done is better than well said.
Ben Franklin
Kingston Wulff is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-26-2022, 11:50 PM   #35
Member
Kingston Wulff
PGCA Member
 
Kingston Wulff's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 48
Thanks: 169
Thanked 42 Times in 15 Posts

Default

response #3 is the one.
__________________
Kingston Wulff
(Nantan Lukan) Apache: wolf warrior

Well done is better than well said.
Ben Franklin
Kingston Wulff is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-27-2022, 12:22 PM   #36
Member
LtCol Henderson Marriott
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
henderson Marriott's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 171
Thanks: 207
Thanked 205 Times in 85 Posts

Default

These are valuable accounts of actual incidents that have taken place during the transition from black powder to smokeless powder.
One of the inherent potential dangers of reloading
at that time was measuring by volume rather than by weight. Many hunters were not fully aware of the pressure differences between black and nitro smokeless powders. They carried their black powder volume measuring techniques right into the smokeless
20th Century. Possibly adding to the potential confusion-for handloaders- were the various"bulk" powders which were created by powder manufacturers to allow measuring by volume, though they were modern smokeless or semi-smokeless in manufacture as powders for that era. Paul Mathews in
" The Paper Jacket" illustrates this potential confusion, as does the Ideal Handbook which
later became the Lyman Manual on reloading. The Ideal volume actually recommended the Hazard Powder Company of Connecticut during this period. Even today, the shotgun shell reloader must know exactly what he is about as to manuals, powder amount , shot loads and existing pressures.
henderson Marriott is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to henderson Marriott For Your Post:
Unread 12-27-2022, 07:38 PM   #37
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,177
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,998 Times in 1,309 Posts

Default

Why? Because Parker said we could.

Parker Brothers 1893 Catalogue
“Our guns are bored on the latest improved system for shooting Nitros, or Smokeless Powder, and all our guns are tested with some one of the most approved makes, and a tag accompanies each gun, giving the results of such a (pattern) test.”

1902 Sears catalog
"ALL ARE BORED FOR NITRO OR BLACK POWDER"



"RST is still 3X the chamber pressure as a BP load." is incorrect
Please see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...aAfUOZEFU/edit

Factory reported RST 12g pressures in 2016. Of course components could be different now
Ultra Lite 2 1/2” 3/4 oz. 4400 psi
Falcon Lite 2 1/2” 7/8 oz. 5400 psi
Maxi Lite 2 1/2” 1 oz. 5700 psi
Lite 2 1/2” 1 1/16 oz. Roll Crimp Paper 5900 psi
Lite 2 1/2" 1 1/16 oz. Plastic 6100 psi
Premium Grade Pheasant 2 3/4” 1 1/4 oz. 7800 psi


Please see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...hIiY62Hx4/edit
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 12-27-2022, 08:18 PM   #38
Member
John Davis
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
John Davis's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,963
Thanks: 4,030
Thanked 7,026 Times in 1,333 Posts

Default

I would not hesitate to shoot those loads in any Damascus barrel gun I own.
__________________
"Life is short and you're dead an awful long time." Destry L. Hoffard

"Oh Christ, just shoot the damn thing."
Destry L. Hoffard
John Davis is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to John Davis For Your Post:
Unread 01-04-2023, 01:38 PM   #39
Member
Harry Collins
PGCA Member
 
Harry Collins's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,914
Thanks: 9,959
Thanked 1,766 Times in 736 Posts

Default

Near 40 years ago Ross Seyfried penned an article in Guns and Ammo. He was shooting his Damascus guns with Federal Paper Hulls, IMR 7625, and Lage UniWads. The pressures produced mimicked BP both in pressure and where the pressure peaked at a little over 5,000 PSI. I overcame my trepidation and started loading his recipe for my Damascus Parkers.
In 1993 John Brindle's conclusion that 8,000 PSI was safe in Damascus in articles published in Double Gun Journal.
in 1999 and 2000 Sherman Bell did a series in Double Gun Journal "Finding Out For Myself." He was offered a sacrificial lamb in the form of a GH on a #2 Frame with Damascus barrels made in 1900. The barrels finally let go at their weakest spot, at the breach where the extractor pin goes between both barrels. Standard SAMMI 12 gauge pressures run around 12,000 PSI. Proof loads are about 18,000 PSI. The sacrificial lamb gave ut the ghost at about 31,000 PSI.
Wondering what pressure Fluid Steel would let go, I offered Sherman Bell a VH 12 gauge on a #2 frame made in 1900 with Vulcan Steel barrels. He accepted and as before he kept loading heavier and heavier loads until the barrels opened up just like the Damascus barrels. The pressure? Exactly the same. About 31,000 PSI.
RST Shells are the best! When they are unavailable, I shoot any manufacturers that is lead shot and under 1200 FPS.
Harry Collins is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Harry Collins For Your Post:
Unread 01-04-2023, 02:20 PM   #40
Member
LtCol Henderson Marriott
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
henderson Marriott's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 171
Thanks: 207
Thanked 205 Times in 85 Posts

Default

Harry has put this discussion in perspective.
The golden rules are : be extra attentive when handloading shotshells for any shotgun;
and each set of barrels and each shotgun may be and will be a law unto itself.
henderson Marriott is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to henderson Marriott For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.