Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 07-25-2014, 05:36 AM   #31
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,941
Thanks: 1,720
Thanked 5,047 Times in 1,424 Posts

Default

The hardest part of shooting nitro powder loads in a composite barreled gun is pulling the trigger for the first time. It gets a lot easier to do after that. Eventually the novelty of it will wear off and you will feel just as comfortable shooting them as any gun.

Surely a good idea to shoot low pressure light loads but that is a good idea any antique shotgun.

The only risk we might be taking is should one do something stupid or unfortunate; overcharge or barrel blockage and something happens where a person is hurt, a personal injury attorney will most likely use those age old warning to build a case for liability.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Unread 07-25-2014, 01:30 PM   #32
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,931
Thanks: 36,411
Thanked 33,935 Times in 12,566 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leighton Stallones View Post
I shoot nearly all laminated and Dammascus as well as many friends of mine. That story was started by unknowledgeable Lawyers in the 60's.


I think it started long before the 60's.... looong before.

These shell boxes are from much earlier than the sixties and I'm sure people can show even earlier boxes with the same warning.

They are all paper hulls.

"Researcher" Dave Noreen can probably tell us when that warning first appeared on various manufacturer's shell boxes.



.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_0001.jpg (510.6 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0002.jpg (524.6 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0003.jpg (487.7 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0004.jpg (501.5 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg DSC_0005.jpg (572.5 KB, 0 views)
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-25-2014, 09:17 PM   #33
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Default

Well they might be right about one thing. The rifled slugs in Damascus barrel.
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-25-2014, 09:22 PM   #34
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,873
Thanks: 1,709
Thanked 8,333 Times in 3,301 Posts

Default

i find the warning not to use in shorter chambers just as interesting
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-25-2014, 09:26 PM   #35
Member
charlie cleveland
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,801 Times in 3,968 Posts

Default

i would not be afraid to shoot slugs in a damascus gun... it just that its hard on the wood sometimes..but if a fellow wouldtake the stock off and reinforce the stock with super glue fiber glass or other such glues these old stocks then can take a big load with in reason..my old stub twist 8 ga has probably had 50 rounds of 2 ounce lead round ball loads shot thru it with no harm to the barrels or the wood....charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to charlie cleveland For Your Post:
Unread 07-25-2014, 09:52 PM   #36
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,931
Thanks: 36,411
Thanked 33,935 Times in 12,566 Posts

Default

Hold on a minute Charlie... I had that 8 gauge at my house and any damage that was gonna happen to that gun has already happened....
if we're talkin about the same gun...


What I mean to say is, that gun shall forevermore be indestructible.... is that better?
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-26-2014, 10:31 AM   #37
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,696
Thanks: 1,718
Thanked 8,121 Times in 2,436 Posts

Default

The first time I've seen something like the Damascus and Twist warnings appear on shotgun shell boxes was the early 12-gauge 3-inch Super-X loads from about 1925 or 1926 --



No mention on this 2 9/16 inch 16-gauge Super-X box of about the same vintage --









The one-piece shell boxes phased in in the 1933-35 time frame, and I've never seen one of those without Damascus and Twist warnings.
Dave Noreen is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 07-26-2014, 06:28 PM   #38
Member
Bill Anderson
PGCA Member
 
Bill Anderson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 239
Thanks: 8
Thanked 149 Times in 73 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=Dean Romig;143589]I think it started long before the 60's.... looong before.

These shell boxes are from much earlier than the sixties and I'm sure people can show even earlier boxes with the same warning.

They are all paper hulls.

"Researcher" Dave Noreen can probably tell us when that warning first appeared on various manufacturer's shell boxes.


In our retail word, everything you see, ad or label, just about anywhere, is all about "making money" plain & simple. All the major gun manufacturers were making the transition to cheaper and faster to produce, thus more profitable steel barrels. So one of the tactics by ammo companies in collaboration with gun manufacturers was to start labeling all ammo so you would discard your Damascus guns. They wanted you to run out and buy one of the new steel barreled guns and in turn you would also buy a good supply of the new fangled ammo to go with it. . That is the single biggest reason the warnings appeared. And it worked until just a few short years ago when Sherman Bell finally did his extensive testing.

Bill
Bill Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Bill Anderson For Your Post:
Unread 07-27-2014, 11:45 AM   #39
Member
todd allen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,176
Thanks: 2,014
Thanked 3,364 Times in 1,157 Posts

Default

How do I feel about Damascus bbls?
I think Fabbri should offer Damascus as an option on their higher grade guns.
todd allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-08-2016, 05:37 PM   #40
Member
King Cobb
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bill Holcombe's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 724
Thanked 1,521 Times in 405 Posts

Default

I just had to bring this one back to the top in case anyone is reading that is in a similar situation to me 2 years ago(was it only 2 years ago....). I am currently in the process of buying my 4th Damascus parker. I have come a long long way from when I first posted this question.
__________________
"The Parker gun was the first and the greatest ever." Theophilus Nash Buckingham
Bill Holcombe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Holcombe For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.