|
05-06-2022, 01:06 PM | #33 | ||||||
|
This thread got me thinking about the various Cheddite primers and published loads. I asked Hodgdon what primer their loading data assumes:
For loads that use Cheddite primers (Ched 209), is any particular Cheddite primer assumed? Cheddite currently offers 3 primers, CX2000, 1000 and 50. Does it matter which one is used for the published loads? Thank you!---Matt Matt Haney Help Account <hpchelp@hodgdon.com> Mon, May 2, 10:20 AM (4 days ago) to me Cx 2000 is the one used for the data and the most commonly available for reloaders. |
||||||
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to MattHaney For Your Post: |
05-06-2022, 03:00 PM | #34 | ||||||
|
If you look at reloading specs such as in the BP Advantages manual, the listed loads for Cheddite primers only say Cheddite 209. There is no reference to CX2000, 1000 or 50 due to the reason Hodgdon states regarding accessibility. With those pesky lawyers involved with everything, you'd think if Cheddite 1000 or 50 were used for the data that it would be included in the recipes.
|
||||||
05-06-2022, 03:03 PM | #35 | ||||||
|
Gary, those are some snotty loads! Personally, whether hunting or shooting clays I'd keep my velocities at 1220 max with 7/8 oz payload.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Koneski For Your Post: |
05-06-2022, 03:45 PM | #36 | ||||||
|
Gary that's a little concerning for sure. In an attempt to prod you into doing so I am in total agreement with your statement on sending your Win primer load in for testing. That would be the tell all in my mind for comparison purposes. If that load has never been tested this info you have just disclosed would make me a little timid about shooting them. Could there really be that much of a spike in this primer switch ? Test the Win load and find out, please ..... Thanks !!
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Randy G Roberts For Your Post: |
05-06-2022, 04:10 PM | #37 | ||||||
|
I have no desire to load and shoot a load in excess of 1200 fps preferring something under. Because I trusted published data I never saw a need to test. That assumption may or may not be correct. In fact we do not know this test data reflects what goes on in a typical barrel. To that, note the bore diameter of the test barrel of .614, That is a bit tighter than a typical 20, at least the one's I own which are closer to .618. Not much difference but how much does it take to uptick pressures?
I do plan on submitting additional losds for testing and included will be my base load with a Win primer. |
||||||
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Gary Laudermilch For Your Post: |
05-06-2022, 04:22 PM | #38 | ||||||
|
Would lengthening the forcing cones be an effective way to reduce pressure and act as a bit of a saftey net?
|
||||||
05-06-2022, 04:57 PM | #39 | ||||||
|
No, not appreciably...
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
05-07-2022, 09:23 AM | #40 | ||||||
|
That load with 20/28 really got my attention. I use 20/28 exlusively now for my20 ga's. I would have thought that would be around 10,000 from the charts
I substitute cheddite for Win 209 in my 20 ga loads. I load 3/4 oz with 14 gr 20/28 and 7/8 oz with 14.5 gr 20/28, soft shooting loads that are listed at 1200 fps or under and 7200--7800 psi respectively per the data.
__________________
"How kind it is that most of us will never know when we have fired our last shot"--Nash Buckingham |
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Harold Lee Pickens For Your Post: |
|
|