|
08-01-2023, 08:57 PM | #33 | ||||||
|
One other comment that needs to be addressed is that you state you bought The Serialization book and made a list of all the guns fitting your description in 1908, then quoted a finite number. Someone, I believe Dean, mentioned that generally only high grade guns were listed in the Serialization book. That is a fact, and a lot, maybe the majority, of the lower grade guns are not listed. The serialization book is basically a summation of the existing higher grade guns records, keeping in mind that the records are incomplete and have whole sections missing. If you wnat a closer number of how many possibilities exist, data such as that is contained in The Parker Story.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Arthur Shaffer For Your Post: |
08-01-2023, 10:11 PM | #34 | ||||||
|
xxxxxxxx
|
||||||
08-01-2023, 11:38 PM | #35 | ||||||
|
Actually Arthur, there is only a section of the serialization book where, for the purposes of the person recording the data, only listed grade 3 and higher…. Not the entire book. His reasons for onitting the lower grades is unknown and can only be guessed at.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
08-02-2023, 11:38 AM | #36 | ||||||
|
Dean is correct. Lower grade guns were listed in their entirety in the main part of the serialization book, as long as the guns were listed in available stock books. Arthur was mistaken.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
08-02-2023, 04:17 PM | #37 | ||||||
|
I guess I wasincorrect. I thought I understood it butreally didn't. I just know that a lot of the lower gradeguns I try to look up are not there. The point I was trying to make though is still valid, I believe. The OP implied he had made a list of all the low grade guns and was going to try and use that to track guns. There are likely a significant number that are not in the book, maybe a lot more.
|
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Arthur Shaffer For Your Post: |
08-02-2023, 04:38 PM | #38 | ||||||
|
That I agree with Art.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
08-02-2023, 06:15 PM | #39 | ||||||
|
The Serialization Book is made up almost entirely from the entries in the Stock Books this includes all grades both hammer and hammerless. These guns were put into a database. There are a total of 30 Stock Books missing that the PGCA doesn't have records for. Each book has about 300 pages so that's approximately 9,000 guns that couldn't be put into the database used for the Serialization Book.
Before publishing the Sterilization Book, we were given access to the Order Books. It was decided to make a database for the Order Books and to search the Order Books for all the guns grade 3 and above that were missing from the Stock Book database (think Sterilization Book) and add them to the database used for the publication of the Sterilization Book. Can you imagine if all guns below grade 3 were included. Remember that Parker made 242k guns. It was just too much work to include all grades from 0 to 9. |
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post: |
08-03-2023, 09:13 AM | #40 | ||||||
|
Art, the part of the Serialization Book you refer to with no lower grade guns is one of the Appendices at the end of the book.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
|
|