|
12-23-2010, 11:14 AM | #33 | ||||||
|
We should all be so lucky. The chances of that happening are slim indeed.
|
||||||
12-23-2010, 11:29 AM | #34 | ||||||
|
Bishops but mostly Fajens made standard V grade configuration and with a deep cut angled thumb groove stocks for the trade. They also made beavertail fore ends. They were machine inletted but required hand fitting, checkering and finishing and addition of a recoil pad. They went to Simmons in Olathe Kansas, around the country and into Ilion, NY. When Fajens closed, Fred Wenig Gunstocks in Lincoln, MO bought the large remainder stock and used them as needed. When Fred retired, the take off inventory was sold and the Fajen remainder new stocks were sold. A noted PGCA member bought the remainder stock and disposed of much of that with the last couple years at cost to members who needed utilitarian stocks and fore end wood. I didn't know what happened to the take off stocks, Cabelas in Kansas City could have ended up with the Simmons take offs or the Fajen/Wenig take offs.
Fred Wenig had been the superintendent for Fajen, later after Fred left to establish his own shop, Donnie Gemmes became the superintendent. Fred retired from his Wenig Gunstocks, it is now employee owned, and Donnie went on to create Show Me Gunstocks. Marti Fajen went on to become the US importer for CZ Guns , a woman owned gun businesses, then several years ago, Marti sold out. Wenig Gunstocks and Show Me Gunstocks still make replacement stocks for Parkers. |
||||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post: |
12-23-2010, 11:43 AM | #35 | ||||||
|
Thanks for that information Bruce.
|
||||||
12-23-2010, 01:37 PM | #36 | ||||||
|
Dean, as further trivia and perhaps not of interest to most, is that Fajen/Bishop/ bought and Wenig /Gemmes still buy their Juglas nigra blanks from St Joe Walnut in St Joseph MO, which also sold local northern Missouri and Iowa walnut blanks to Parker Bros. Just as in the Meridan days, there are some wonderful pieces of air dried highly figured stump walnut that come from this region.
I believe it likely that many of if not most of the utilitarian V grade type stocks we see as replacements came as rough cut, inletted stocks from Fajen/Bishops. They did very well during the 50's and 60's with sporter stocks for all the war surplus 1903 Springfields being sold....remember the NRA ads for surplus 03's, what were they $20? Bill would know. There were also 30 Cal Carbine stocks when they were surplused out. My dad bought a Spanish American War era Krag with a Bishop stock and hunted deer when we lived in SoDak. They made a lot of replacement stocks for M. 12's and those beavertail forends to replace the corn cob forends. The Parker replacement stocks I've seen had the deep angled thumb grooves like the replacement M 12 stocks. While its easy to tell that these are not original Parker stocks, they were certainly utilitarian and not costly , and I think they might have preserved many Parkers for use today that might have been discarded and lost because of broken stocks, high drop, or other features that owners found undesireable. |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post: |
12-24-2010, 07:19 PM | #37 | ||||||
|
Guys, I never thought I'd start so much conversation. Just proof in the comments from some of you earlier about how much fun I'll have as a member (just lazy so far about signing up).
On the topic of regulation, one thing I noted was comments that the barrels should be set for the shot to cross streams at say 50 yards. if that's the case, then given that the centerlines on the muzzles of the 12 gage are about 1.25 inch (I admit that's eyeball accuracy but, as my father always says, it's close enough for the girls we go with) and if my math is right, then for the centerlines to meet at 50 yards, they'd only be canted in 0.025 deg towards each other. Seems hard to believe such accuracy in manufacture could have been attained in pre CNC machined days. And, I'm not sure how much it would have helped. Given that at 50 yards the pattern is many inches, if my two streams were exactly parallel, they'd still have probably 90% or better overlap. Looking at the issue of the bead height above the barrel and how moving it back would affect elevation, it's tough to say. One would have to know what the original intent of the the set up was - e.g. was the bead set so that a line from the top to the back of the rib would precisely parallel the bore centerline, or was it slightly below so that sighting would place the bore extended center line above the aim point to compensate for drop at some point. I suspect the latter since assuming muzzle velocity of 1000 fps, drop would be about 5 or 6 inches at 50 yards. Again, back to some trig, setting up the aim line to be 6 inches below the bore centerline at 50 yards requires about 0.2 deg difference between the two. That 0.2 deg difference would mean the top of the bead would have to be about 0.105 inch lower than the rear sighting point of the rib. Moving in 2 inches closer means it would have to be 0.098 inches lower than the rear sight point instead, or about 0.007" difference. Doesn't sound like much, but it is about a 7% change which, if the original sighting was to compensate for 6 inches of drop, this would change the point of impact by around 0.5". For the Sunday trap shooter or farmer out hunting, probably no big deal. But for the top end competitors, maybe one fewer hits out of 400. That could be important. All that said, I think it takes means two things. First, as someone else said, take it out and shoot it to see if it's on target or not (though as I noted, I don't intended shooting the gun). Second it means after reading this some of you will be advising me to reconsider joining. |
||||||
|
|