Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Announcement, Help & Introduction Forums New User Introductions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-15-2024, 04:12 PM   #1
Member
David C Porter
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 283
Thanks: 48
Thanked 368 Times in 124 Posts

Default

Yes, & also the tubes weren't centered on the boring. They are pencil thin at the breech from about 3 o'clock to 6 o'clock.
David C Porter is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2024, 07:57 PM   #2
Member
David C Porter
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 283
Thanks: 48
Thanked 368 Times in 124 Posts

Default

I doubt that they would be furnace brazed since they were demi-bloced with the bottom bloc brazed at the breech end & the rear & top ribs soft soldered. Trying to braze the sleeves in would more than likely make the breech end come apart.
David C Porter is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2024, 09:29 PM   #3
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,808
Thanks: 3,479
Thanked 13,946 Times in 3,653 Posts

Default

Ribs aren't laid at that point, and they wrap the whole breech with iron wire.
edgarspencer is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2024, 09:47 PM   #4
Member
David C Porter
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 283
Thanks: 48
Thanked 368 Times in 124 Posts

Default

I understand the process. Been there & done it many times.
David C Porter is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2024, 09:52 PM   #5
Member
Pitts Yandell
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Default

So all this being said is there an explanation for one source saying it wasn't born a 28 gauge and another authority says is was born a 28 gauge.
Pitts Yandell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-15-2024, 10:32 PM   #6
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,023
Thanks: 1,298
Thanked 5,482 Times in 1,539 Posts

Default

Show me the source that says it wasn't born a 28 gauge gun. The letter told you how it was built. That's the way it left the factory.
Chuck Bishop is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 11-16-2024, 09:13 AM   #7
Member
Pitts Yandell
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Bishop View Post
Show me the source that says it wasn't born a 28 gauge gun. The letter told you how it was built. That's the way it left the factory.
The comment was solely based on this sentence from the first page, "The serial number 131429 is not on the list of 28-gauge guns from the records, published in The Parker Story, page 1005. So, it likely started life as an 0-frame 16- or 20-gauge." Not having the book I made some assumption about its authority.

The thread then continues on to find all possible evidence that it was "retubbed", thus leading to my confusion. So apologies if offense was taken.
Pitts Yandell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2024, 10:46 AM   #8
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,099
Thanks: 7,105
Thanked 10,608 Times in 5,569 Posts

Default

The "list" of 28 gauges is only one of the sources available to the PGCA researcher. Maybe it's time to repost the article that explains how the research material was found and how it was put into its final form.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-17-2024, 08:07 PM   #9
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,052
Thanks: 1,986
Thanked 9,453 Times in 2,736 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Bishop View Post
Show me the source that says it wasn't born a 28 gauge gun. The letter told you how it was built. That's the way it left the factory.
Chuck, what I said was "The serial number 131429 is not on the list of 28-gauge guns from the records, published in The Parker Story, page 1005." As much of page 1005 as I could get on my scanner --

Page 1005 The Parker Story 28-gauge Guns, no 131429.jpg
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-17-2024, 08:33 PM   #10
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,808
Thanks: 3,479
Thanked 13,946 Times in 3,653 Posts

Default

Without taking anything away from the TPS authors, the time involved in searching the available books didn't permit the necessary scrutiny the research director afforded me. When I acquired 99687, the database said it found no records. This made no sense to me as 99686, and 99688 were listed in the serializations book (99686 is listed as a 28ga) The research director carefully examined the books and found that a red pencil mark obscured the numeral 7, but close examination showed it was a 28ga. The records further showed it was ordered with 99686, as an identical pair.
edgarspencer is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.